On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 11:39, David Kalnischkies
kalnischkies+deb...@gmail.com wrote:
And as a more technical reason we want to bump policy compatibly
now to 3.8.3 where translations should be in sync with the original
files and we can't say this would be true for such an old translation.
2009/12/12 Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org:
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 11:39, David Kalnischkies
kalnischkies+deb...@gmail.com wrote:
So you can still ship the not up-to-date manpages but you have to warn
users of their state.
As far as i read on debian-devel back in the day there is no
consense
Quoting Sandro Tosi (mo...@debian.org):
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 11:39, David Kalnischkies
kalnischkies+deb...@gmail.com wrote:
And as a more technical reason we want to bump policy compatibly
now to 3.8.3 where translations should be in sync with the original
files and we can't say this
Hi,
You are noted as the last translator of the translation for the manpages
of apt (in an old format). The English template has been changed -
it even uses with po4a a totally new system - and as i converted all old
translations to the new system all these strings are now marked
automatically as
Hi again l10n-italian,
as the discussion started already in a different thread which is
unfortunately in italian i can't understand much, but i think
i understand enough to clarify a few things:
The old translation has the last change in 2000 (!), so it is really
old and i don't know if the
5 matches
Mail list logo