Re: [bob@redhat.com: Re: Gnome?]

1998-12-02 Thread Marcelo E. Magallon
On Wed, Dec 02, 1998 at 10:45:19AM -0800, Joseph Carter wrote: > On Wed, Dec 02, 1998 at 07:49:09AM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: > > This is a non-sensical thread that refuses to die on the XL or Beowulf > > list... it's just interesting to note s/o at RH is also talking with Troll. > > Why w

Re: [bob@redhat.com: Re: Gnome?]

1998-12-02 Thread Joseph Carter
On Wed, Dec 02, 1998 at 07:49:09AM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: > This is a non-sensical thread that refuses to die on the XL or Beowulf > list... it's just interesting to note s/o at RH is also talking with Troll. Why wouldn't there be? There's someone from Debian talking to them. => --

Re: Proposed QPL mods - 3rd try

1998-12-02 Thread john
Andreas Pour writes: > Also, IMHO Qt cannot afford to have a license as poorly drafted as the > GPL... The GPL is extremely well drafted. > I think it is a huge mistake to have computer programmers draft legal > agreements/licenses. And the reason the GPL is extremely well drafted is that it was

Re: Proposed QPL mods - 3rd try

1998-12-02 Thread john
Joseph Carter writes: > Many people have said that shrinkwrap licenses on the vast majority of > non-free software are illegal, point is that usually these companies are > US based and in the US whether or not you win in court is directly > proportional to how well you pay your lawyers and how many

[bob@redhat.com: Re: Gnome?]

1998-12-02 Thread Marcelo E. Magallon
This is a non-sensical thread that refuses to die on the XL or Beowulf list... it's just interesting to note s/o at RH is also talking with Troll. Marcelo--- Begin Message --- Oleg, I am actively talking to the Troll Tech folks and others about all these issues.

Re: interesting license :-)

1998-12-02 Thread Joseph Carter
On Tue, Dec 01, 1998 at 10:07:16PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote: > I think this probably counts as non-DFSG free because it restricts against > fields of endeavor (although it's a little unclear if the additional > restriction is mrequired or merely encouraged). But it's also hilarious. > Don't read furt

interesting license :-)

1998-12-02 Thread Joey Hess
I think this probably counts as non-DFSG free because it restricts against fields of endeavor (although it's a little unclear if the additional restriction is mrequired or merely encouraged). But it's also hilarious. Don't read further if you're easily offended. If you arn't easily offended, take a