Re: Would this comply with DFSG?

Previously James Troup wrote: > Oh, good, someone chuck vim in non-free, if it's license hasn't > changed then. Hey, hold on! It so happend I'm currently discussing the vim license with its author (Bram Moolenaar) at the moment, and I have good hopes of getting it fixed. Wichert. -- ===

Re: Would this comply with DFSG?

James Troup writes: > Oh, good, someone chuck vim in non-free, if it's license hasn't > changed then. I know nothing about the license on 'vim', or on most Debian's other 2000+ packages, except that someone at some time judged them DFSG compliant. I'm not about to read through them all and second

Re: Would this comply with DFSG?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > |ii - making an honest attempt at communicating your > | modifications to [us], e.g., by sending them by > | email [...] You may distribute your modified > | version even if you have not got a response yet, > | or even if you have bee