from postfix mailing list. i would like to know if this licence is dfsg ok.
andreas
--
And here it is. Reactions are welcome, before we apply this license
to Postfix/Secure Mailer.
Wietse
IBM PUBLIC LICENSE - [INSERT N
FYI
I'm not on debian-legal, sorry if it has been posted already :/
- Forwarded message from Wietse Venema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Subject: Please review: Official IBM Public License
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Postfix users)
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 10:18:23 -0400 (EDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (
This is potentially the new license for the IBM Secure Mailer (aka
Postfix), and might get applied to other things.
I'm not on debian-legal, but I would encourage anyone who has any
reasons this wouldn't be DFSG free to contact Weitse.
Mike.
--- Begin Message ---
And here it is. Reactions are w
This got bounced already a couple of times, and I thought you
might be interested as well.
Now go and tear it apart :)
Wichert.
--- Begin Message ---
And here it is. Reactions are welcome, before we apply this license
to Postfix/Secure Mailer.
Wietse
-
I'm packaging a backup tool (Burt: downloaded from
http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~jmelski/burt/)
But i'm not sure if following part of license is DFSG (1. Free
Redistribution) compliant:
A reasonable copying fee may be charged for any distribution of
this software, but no fee may be charged for th
On Tue, Jun 22, 1999 at 09:14:29AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Jim Pick writes:
> > So? We have to comply with US export laws anyways. If somebody else
> > wants to break those laws, it doesn't come back at us - they just lose
> > their right to use/distribute the software.
So it is the sa
Tom Lear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Got it. How about "You still need a separate licence to do so from the
> owner(s) of the copyright for XForms, see the XForms copyright."?
I see no problem with that.
--
Henning Makholm
Jim Pick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Any distribution of this software, a modified version thereof, or a
> > derivative work must comply with all applicable United States export
> > control laws.
> So? We have to comply with US export laws anyways.
I don't. A license that only gives me perm
Jim Pick writes:
> Torsten Landschoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 21, 1999 at 07:16:08PM +0200, Bart Schuller wrote:
> >
> > > Before you do that, I seem to remember that the license for ILU had been
> > > cleared up a couple of months ago. Looking at
> > > ftp://ftp.par
Torsten Landschoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 1999 at 07:16:08PM +0200, Bart Schuller wrote:
>
> > Before you do that, I seem to remember that the license for ILU had been
> > cleared up a couple of months ago. Looking at
> > ftp://ftp.parc.xerox.com/pub/ilu/ilu.html
> > I can
10 matches
Mail list logo
