Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Note that this quote uses the phrase "licensed as a whole".
>
> If you continue reading (top of the next page), you'll see:
I don't see how that section applies to the scenario we're discussing
(a program that reuses some code from an IBM-licensed progra
Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Fabien Ninoles wrote:
> > b) Full source code [binaries optional]
> >You may choose to provide source modifications, and binaries based
> >on those modifications. However, the original program
> >distribution must be present,
On Friday 2 July 1999, at 18 h 4, the keyboard of [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Jikes belongs to IBM, so they'll may be change their licence
>
> This is quite likely.
I don't know if they did. Let's wait the opinion of the Jikes maintainer. And,
as Nicolas reminded us, Jikes depends (really depe
Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>
> On Friday 2 July 1999, at 18 h 4, the keyboard of [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > > Jikes belongs to IBM, so they'll may be change their licence
> >
> > This is quite likely.
>
> I don't know if they did. Let's wait the opinion of the Jikes maintainer. And,
> as Nic
> > But when you
> > distribute the same sections as part of a whole which is a work based
> > on the Program, the distribution of the whole must be on the terms of
> > this License, whose permissions for other licensees extend to the
> > entire whole, and thus to each and every part regardless of
5 matches
Mail list logo
