Need a legal opinion on the following license. I assume #9 causes this
to be classifiable as non-free (pity, though) -- the only other
concern I had was whether #8 posed any sort of problem for our including
software under this license in Debian.
1. Grant Of License. [Company name], having a
On Jul 31, Mike Goldman wrote:
Need a legal opinion on the following license. I assume #9 causes this
to be classifiable as non-free (pity, though) -- the only other
concern I had was whether #8 posed any sort of problem for our including
software under this license in Debian.
...
9.
On Sat, Jul 31, 1999 at 01:09:47AM -0400, Mike Goldman wrote:
Need a legal opinion on the following license. I assume #9 causes this
to be classifiable as non-free (pity, though) -- the only other
concern I had was whether #8 posed any sort of problem for our including
software under this
To the extent that it is US specific in its discrimination, I suppose it is
actually *good* -- this means it is unrestricted for use by the government of,
say, Canada or France. Indeed I do not think there is any restriction against
their use.
FWIW, this license is for software which has not
4 matches
Mail list logo
