On Sunday 7 November 1999, at 16 h 31, the keyboard of Mark Wielaard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That copyright notice seems to apply only to the DOM specification itself.
> Not to the actual Java source files.
OK, I missed that point.
> Please make sure that you get the latest Java language
I'd suggest you start with the Open Publication License, remove the options,
and generalize it. They did a pretty good job, and the attribution requirements
work well to give a little edge to the people who paid for the work without
taking the result out of Open Source.
Thanks
Bru
On Sun, Nov 07, 1999 at 04:34:05PM -0700, David Wiley wrote:
> I have been hoping to update the original OpenContent license for sometime,
> if I
> could ever get a dialog going about its strengths and weaknesses... What
> specific
> suggestions do you (and everyone else) have?
My suggestion is
On Sun, Nov 07, 1999 at 03:20:48PM -0800, Bruce Perens wrote:
> From: Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > The first part only allows distribution for money if it's "for use offline".
> > This forbids distribution for money over a network. Either makes
> > it non-free.
>
> I think this is jus
Joe Drew and I are packaging doom stuff since we now can and one of the
things that I'm working on is xwadtools. It looks like I'll have to do
some hellish things in order to be able to put the package in main, simply
because it's actually a collection of packages, not all of them free.
Some of i
5 matches
Mail list logo
