On Tue, 11 Jan 2000, Brian Ristuccia wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2000 at 09:55:31PM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
> > Robert Varga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> quotes a stupid license:
> >
> > > "You may only use the Program Code if you are a current licensee of RedHat
> > > 6.0 Linux or Caldera OpenLinux
On Tue, Jan 11, 2000 at 09:55:31PM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Robert Varga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> quotes a stupid license:
>
> > "You may only use the Program Code if you are a current licensee of RedHat
> > 6.0 Linux or Caldera OpenLinux 2.2 operating system.
>
> Is there even such a thing as
On 11 Jan 2000, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Robert Varga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> quotes a stupid license:
>
> > "You may only use the Program Code if you are a current licensee of RedHat
> > 6.0 Linux or Caldera OpenLinux 2.2 operating system.
>
> Is there even such a thing as "a licensee of RedHat 6
Robert Varga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> quotes a stupid license:
> "You may only use the Program Code if you are a current licensee of RedHat
> 6.0 Linux or Caldera OpenLinux 2.2 operating system.
Is there even such a thing as "a licensee of RedHat 6.0"?
> I would like to know whether there is a legall
Ok, I was suggested to bring it up here, to provide some ammunition to
contacting IBM. I am not quoting the discussion replies occured before on
debian-users.
My question:
The following two sentences can be found in the License Agreement of the
IBM JDK and JRE for Linux v1.1.8:
"You may only us
On Mon, Jan 10, 2000 at 11:18:11PM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit Mike Markley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > If I'm reading this snippet correctly, all it's saying is that the images
> > and other data can't be distributed w/o the GPL'd source code. I'm not
> > entirely sure on whether or no
Marc,
At 1:33 PM +0100 11/1/2000, Marc van Leeuwen wrote:
Thanks for your thoughtful comments on my licence. I think you have some
good points, and I think I'm going to have to go off and redraft this
clause and try and get it right this time.
But I also think you're mistaken on a few points, so
Dear Ross N. Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
you wrote
> How's this for a new trigger condition for The Free World Licence:
>
> 2.1 CONTRACT: This Licence is a legal contract between you
> and the Original Licensor (and possibly between you and
> other contributing Licensors as well)
Mike Markley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> If I'm reading this snippet correctly, all it's saying is that the images
> and other data can't be distributed w/o the GPL'd source code. I'm not
> entirely sure on whether or not this fits w/the DFSG...
>
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2000 at 10:17:23PM +0100, Rich
9 matches
Mail list logo
