I agree that different kinds of licenses are appropriate for different
kinds of works. I am writing the GNU Free Documentation License for
documentation--that is, for manuals. It is also a good license for
any sort of textbook. For some kinds of works, such as fiction,
permitting just verbatim
On Tue, Jan 18, 2000 at 08:31:58AM -0500, Deb Richardson wrote:
I think that this is an extremely bad idea. Having more licenses,
particularly those like the OPL and the new FSF licenses, is a good
thing. Having only one license doesn't do much for an author's freedom
of choice, really,
On Wed, Jan 19, 2000 at 04:34:57PM -0500, Gary Lawrence Murphy wrote:
the other 50% is a nightmare --- I suggest allowing a polyglot of
ill-conceived roll-yer-own licences is tantamount to software patents:
Future developers/integrators/authors/users cannot do anything without
a lawyer present
Scripsit Pontus Lidman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm looking at a network analysis tool called 'pchar', which has the
following license:
This work was first produced by an employee of Sandia National
Laboratories under a contract with the U.S. Department of Energy.
Sandia National Laboratories
On Wed, Jan 19, 2000 at 05:27:23PM -0500, Gary Lawrence Murphy wrote:
(does anyone really want to modify Alice In Wonderland?)
I'd prefer a blue rabbit :-)
and should be extended and ammended over time, should be DGPL to be of
maximum worth to the community (and probably to the author as
Hi all,
I can not determine whether this license is DFSG compliant or not,
and i do not agree with opinions expressed on comp.text.tex about my
questions.
So could someone confirm this is DFSG compliant, as claimed by the LaTeX
Team ?
I put `-' marks in front of the 3 lines causing trouble.
Denis Barbier wrote:
I can not determine whether this license is DFSG compliant or not,
and i do not agree with opinions expressed on comp.text.tex about my
questions.
So could someone confirm this is DFSG compliant, as claimed by the LaTeX
Team ?
I put `-' marks in front of the 3 lines
7 matches
Mail list logo