Re: Libapache-mod-backhand: load balancing Apache requests.

2001-04-18 Thread Brian Behlendorf
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Richard Braakman wrote: > On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 01:26:13PM -0700, Brian Behlendorf wrote: > > I am pretty sure that such a clause has always been a part of the Apache > > licenses. The intent is pretty simple - we don't want people calling > > their commercial derivatives "Ap

Re: Bug#94162: proftpd: mod_opie.c is missing

2001-04-18 Thread Ivo Timmermans
Martin Godisch wrote: > proftpd fails to authenticate using OPIE challenge response protocol. > Please check http://inner.net/pub/opie/contrib/mod_opie.c.gz, whether this > module can be compiled into the Debian version. Include files can be found > e.g. in package opie-client. The module includes

RE: Need legal advice regarding CSS in Germany

2001-04-18 Thread Sam Johnston
This is often depending on the amount of money handed over too... if I get something for free and it doesn't work then I can hardly expect to be able to take it back for repair/replacement/etc. if I pay a token fee for it the same will likely apply. however if I pay, say a few hundred dollars for a

Re: License for fortunes?

2001-04-18 Thread David Starner
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 02:40:27PM -0500, Chad Phillips wrote: > My best guess is if it is just > raw quotes it is not copyrightable. Where you get into a problem is where > someone creates a database/collection that has some type of added value. Copyright law is designed to protect creative expr

debian-legal´Ô ¾È³çÇϼ¼¿ä?

2001-04-18 Thread ¿Â¶óÀÎÄÚ¸®¾Æ
¢Ä ¿À´ÃÀÇ À¯¸Ó ¢Å ¡á°ú½Ã¿åA girl got an engagement ring, and would seize every opportunity for calling attention to it.  In a group with girl friends no one noticed it.  Finally when herfriends were sitting around talking, she got up suddenly and said, "It's awful

RE: License for fortunes?

2001-04-18 Thread Chad Phillips
Sounds like the Fiest phone book case. Facts aren't copyrightable but like David said the collection as a whole may be. My best guess is if it is just raw quotes it is not copyrightable. Where you get into a problem is where someone creates a database/collection that has some type of added value

Re: License for fortunes?

2001-04-18 Thread Carlos Laviola
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 18-Apr-2001 David Starner wrote: > [This is a legal question; it belongs on debian-legal.] > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 01:48:17PM -0300, Carlos Laviola wrote: >> I was wondering if I could consider fortunes to be in public domain, or if I >> have

Re: License for fortunes?

2001-04-18 Thread David Starner
[This is a legal question; it belongs on debian-legal.] On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 01:48:17PM -0300, Carlos Laviola wrote: > I was wondering if I could consider fortunes to be in public domain, or if I > have to have an exact permission from the person that collected them. The quotes may be uncopyr

License for fortunes?

2001-04-18 Thread Carlos Laviola
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I was wondering if I could consider fortunes to be in public domain, or if I have to have an exact permission from the person that collected them. The problem is that I got a database of atheist fortunes from Wayne Aiken's site (http://www4.ncs

[leader@debian.org: Possible legal help found, let's get our facts straight...]

2001-04-18 Thread Ben Collins - DPL
Forwarded here to hopefully get a better response. Note, I have given a one week deadline from today for organization of the groups. - Forwarded message from Ben Collins - DPL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - From: Ben Collins - DPL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Possible legal help found, let's get o