Me wrote:
provide a last archive with another license. My question is: what
keeps cthugha from being free?
Thank you for your reply (and getting it from the archive and
going through it). You nearly answered the q. that i had on mind:
What is the quickest, most painless way (for him) to get
[cc and reply-to more appropriate list]
Richard Atterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 10:42:59AM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
[doc-html-w3]
That package is in non-free. IIRC the issue is that you can't modify
the standards. Which is somewhat understandable, but still
On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 08:55:45PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
So, should the RFCs go in non-free as well?
Probably. See bug#92810, which probably needs more attention.
AIUI, the GNU Open Publication License also allows authors to restrict
the right of making modifications to parts
Hello again,
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 03:01:20PM -0500, David Starner wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 09:02:02PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
This is part of my distribution agreement with the
university - I am not allowed to distribute the software to
companies without a fee (which mainly
The remainder of the source (not already public domain, no explicit
author's copyright notice) is Copyright 1995-97 by Harald
Deischinger.
The source code may be copied freely and may be used in other
I think this may remain? While this has to be changed:
yes public domain
5 matches
Mail list logo
