Re: Apple Public Source License APSL v1.2 2001-01-04 www.publicsource.apple.com/apsl/

2001-09-28 Thread Walter Landry
> Scripsit Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Previously Henning Makholm wrote: > > > > I think this is non-free. It means that people without net access > > > cannot receive the software on disks from a friend and later give > > > the friend back a bugfixed version. > > > Does it say `imme

Move SELFHTML to non-free?

2001-09-28 Thread Uwe Hermann
Hi everyone. I have already exlpained the situation regarding SELFHTML in the thread "selfhtml nonfree?" (a few weeks ago). Basically SELFHTML is in main, but shouldn't be there because it violates (among others) DFSG#8. I contacted the upstream author, but haven't received any reply within rough

Re: Apple Public Source License APSL v1.2 2001-01-04 www.publicsource.apple.com/apsl/

2001-09-28 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Previously Henning Makholm wrote: > > I think this is non-free. It means that people without net access > > cannot receive the software on disks from a friend and later give > > the friend back a bugfixed version. > Does it say `immediately' or `ele

Re: Apple Public Source License APSL v1.2 2001-01-04 www.publicsource.apple.com/apsl/

2001-09-28 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Henning Makholm wrote: > I think this is non-free. It means that people without net access > cannot receive the software on disks from a friend and later give > the friend back a bugfixed version. Does it say `immediately' or `electronically' ? Wichert. -- _

Re: Apple Public Source License APSL v1.2 2001-01-04 www.publicsource.apple.com/apsl/

2001-09-28 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit Walter Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > The requirement that all modifications must be made publicly available > is a bit annoying. If I give a modification to a friend, I am > required to publish the modification to the world for the next 12 > months. It's probably ok, although I'm willing