Hello,
I am still a bit confused as to the problems with
linking GPL code with OPENSSL. I don't intend to start
any flame wars...
Please send CCs to me. Thanks.
If there is somewhere I can find this information, URLs
would be appreciated.
1. What is the problem? I have read the GPL, and cannot
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 04:15:09PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
1. What is the problem? I have read the GPL, and cannot recall the
problem. According to the top of /usr/doc/openssl/copyright,
openssl has a dual BSD style license. I haven't heard of problems
linking GPL code with BSD code before. So
Stephen Zander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For the rest, I'll remove IDEA, DSS LUC from the upstream tarball,
put that in non-us/main for now, package the IDEA code separately and
put it in non-us/non-free
Well, like I said, I don't think that you really need to remove LUC.
A vague claim that
Hi
On Friday, 19. April 2002 11:53, Tille, Andreas wrote:
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 01:45:19PM +0200, Andreas Tille
wrote:
Unfortunately it may not be quite so free. I haven't checked
it in detail, but I'm told the only decent sound support is
Stephen Zander wrote:
No, I meant what I said. While at least one country in the world
refuses to recognise software patents, there will be a safe place for
that which we currently call non-US to exist (the fact that it's
currently called non-US rather than non-encumbered or something
else
David Starner wrote:
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 04:15:09PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
2. Is URL:http://www.openssl.org/support/faq.html#LEGAL wrong? ie.
the GPL does not place restrictions on using libraries that are part of
the normal operating system distribution.
Yes, it does state that.
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 11:52:58AM +0200, Arnoud Galactus Engelfriet wrote:
Stephen Zander wrote:
I don't believe the US will ever stop supporting softare patents;
there's too much money at stake.
By the same reasoning, the EC member states should also all
support software patents. The
Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 11:52:58AM +0200, Arnoud Galactus Engelfriet wrote:
Stephen Zander wrote:
I don't believe the US will ever stop supporting softare patents;
there's too much money at stake.
By the same reasoning, the EC member states should also all
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 01:57:21PM +0200, Arnoud Galactus Engelfriet wrote:
Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 11:52:58AM +0200, Arnoud Galactus Engelfriet wrote:
Stephen Zander wrote:
I don't believe the US will ever stop supporting softare patents;
there's too much money
On Sun, 2002-04-21 at 02:15, Brian May wrote:
I normally like the GPL, but I find it a bit irratating that I can't
take some GPL program, and link it against Heimdal (which happens to
be linked against OpenSSL), without express permission from all the
copyright holders of the GPL software. In
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 04:15:09PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
I normally like the GPL, but I find it a bit irratating that I can't
take some GPL program, and link it against Heimdal (which happens to
be linked against OpenSSL), without express permission from all the
copyright holders of the GPL
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 06:34:30PM -0700, Stephen Zander wrote:
Walter == Walter Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Walter DSS and IDEA are both patented in Europe, so putting it in
Walter non-us won't help. There is also the minor problem that
Walter non-us is going the away.
I
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 04:15:09PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
Hello,
I am still a bit confused as to the problems with
linking GPL code with OPENSSL. I don't intend to start
any flame wars...
Please send CCs to me. Thanks.
If there is somewhere I can find this information, URLs
would be
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 04:24:03PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
There have always been problems linking GPL code with BSD code, so long
as the GPL has existed. Only code licensed under the new,
recently revised BSD license can be linked with GPL code. OpenSSL
doesn't use such a new-style
14 matches
Mail list logo
