Boris Veytsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, earlier you claimed that only LaTeX community is completely
> confused and misguided about our licenses. Now you you seem to claim
> that both TeX users and Knuth himself do not understand what he
> wrote. A rather cheeky notion.
I spoke of those
Boris Veytsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Now you are tempted to consider Knuth to be ignorant -- worse, to be
> an evidently stupid person who does not realize he is ignorant and
> pontificates about things he has no business to talk about. Well,
> since it is established that Knuth is a great
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
> Date: 09 Aug 2002 19:07:26 -0700
>
> In fact, everyone does, in fact, modify TeX before installing it.
> Nobody, in fact, installs an unmodified TeX. This is a central fact
> massively ignored by so many that I have to say it in each post,
> ra
First, three quotations:
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
> Date: 09 Aug 2002 19:01:06 -0700
>
> This is a massively inconsistent sentence. But there is one and only
> one way to make it consistent. The files are in the public
> domain--fully, completely--and the rest of the s
Boris Veytsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I do NOT think that Debian really wishes to do this or to change
> LaTeX. My understanding it that they want to have a *right* to do
> this, but do not wish to exercise this right. The argument between
> Thomas and me was exactly this: Thomas thinks tha
Frank Mittelbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I fear you miss the cruical point here:
>
> Thomas interpretation is that of a crippled fragment of the TeX system that
> he wants to judges on its own (ie let's look at TeX "the program")
> while Boris, David, and I try to explain that it is our
On 08 Aug 2002 15:37:29 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) wrote:
>Lars Hellström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> In a broad sense of intent perhaps, but I got clear impression Thomas had
>> something much more concrete and close in mind.
>
>The GPL applies to anything that counts as
> Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 16:15:01 +0200
> From: Frank Mittelbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Frank, thanks for a very lucid and thoughtful comment. It is very
helpful.
I must say, however, that I somewhat disagree with one of your points,
namely:
>
> Thus our point is that building a distribution consi
Nick Phillips wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 08:00:43AM -0600, Joe Moore wrote:
>> Section 1 of the GPL grants permission to "copy and distribute
>> verbatim copies".
>> Section 2 grants permission to "modify [...], and copy, and
>> distribute". Section 3 grants permission to "copy and distribute
Alan Shutko writes:
> Boris Veytsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I afraid you are in state of denial. You have certain ideas about
> > programmer's freedom. You value these ideas too much, you just cannot
> > accept the fact that Knuth does not share them.
>
> I doubt it's that. I t
Title: Tures Andalucia 2002 - Residential Tourism Fair
Dear
Sir or Madam:
We are
pleased to invite you to an exclusive event to enjoy Marbella, one of the
most charming places in Andalusia, in the South of Spain.
TURES
Andalucia® 2002, the
11 matches
Mail list logo
