On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 16:59, Martin Schulze wrote:
> http://slashdot.org/articles/02/08/27/1626241.shtml
>
> New MP3 License Terms Demand $0.75 Per Decoder
[snip]
As a Canadian, and also the author of an mp3 player (though not the
decoder itself), can I be legitamitely hounded for money? (Ign
H just read at Slashdot that Thomson and Fraunhofer have changed their
minds and now want to charge for mp3 decoders, too (?).
http://www.mp3licensing.com/royalty/software.html
http://slashdot.org/articles/02/08/27/1626241.shtml?tid=155
http://www.xiph.org/ogg/vorbis/openletter.ht
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 06:19:19PM -0700, Walter Landry wrote:
> > Should this be done in the debian diff, or a new orig.tar.gz?
>
> You would have to make a new orig.tar.gz. Debian is not allowed to
> distribute the "original" sources at all, since they aren't in the
> preferred form for modific
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 01:35:01PM +0300, Richard Braakman wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 06:19:19PM -0700, Walter Landry wrote:
> > > Should this be done in the debian diff, or a new orig.tar.gz?
> > You would have to make a new orig.tar.gz. Debian is not allowed to
> > distribute the "origina
Walter Landry wrote:
> Did Mindterm make any modifications to the code after they learned of
> the new licensing conditions? If so, they might have thought that
> they had to put modifications under the new license.
Well it's a little bit hard to tell if they modified it at some point;
the change
Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This affects more than just obfuscators. For example, if a GPL'd
> program includes Yacc sources, then I don't think the C files generated
> by Yacc are distributable at all.
You certainly must distribute the Yacc source. You cannot distribute
ju
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 10:53:26AM +0100, Esteban Manchado Velázquez wrote:
> H just read at Slashdot that Thomson and Fraunhofer have changed their
> minds and now want to charge for mp3 decoders, too (?).
>
>http://www.mp3licensing.com/royalty/software.html
www.mp3licensing.com list
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 12:23:48PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > This affects more than just obfuscators. For example, if a GPL'd
> > program includes Yacc sources, then I don't think the C files generated
> > by Yacc are distributable at all.
>
> You certainly must distribute the Yacc
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 09:34:52AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> The C files are derived works of the yacc sources, are they not? The GPL
> is already quite clear about permitting redistribution of derived works.
Yes, and what it clearly says is that derived works can be distributed
under the te
Title: : gosibooks.com :
êµì¬êµ¬ì
ë¹
80,000 ì
문ì : 02-785-4943
ìí¸ : ê°ì´ëë°°ì ëí : ë°°ì¡ë ì í : 02-785-4943 www.zzeung.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
주ì : ìì¸ì ìë±í¬êµ¬ ì¬
Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 12:23:48PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > > This affects more than just obfuscators. For example, if a GPL'd
> > > program includes Yacc sources, then I don't think the C files generated
> > > by Yacc are distributable
Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 09:34:52AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > The C files are derived works of the yacc sources, are they not? The GPL
> > is already quite clear about permitting redistribution of derived works.
>
> Yes, and what it clearly sa
On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 09:50, C.M. Connelly wrote:
>
> "JL" == Jeff Licquia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> "WL" == Walter Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> JL> There's a new draft floating around. It also has
> JL> problems, but is closer to what we need, and I think the
> JL> problems can be wor
13 matches
Mail list logo
