On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 14:53, Glenn Maynard wrote:
Read it as as an additional restriction, all additional materials
mentioning ... It's still a restriction, and a cumbersome one.
I don't recall what makes advertising clauses DFSG-free. Unenforcability?
It doesn't violate DFSG 9, because
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 11:11:42PM -0500, Jeff Licquia wrote:
I don't recall what makes advertising clauses DFSG-free. Unenforcability?
It doesn't violate DFSG 9, because it's not making any claims on the
other software. The advertising clause kicks in whether you distribute
the software
OK, I was up _way_ too late...
As far as the Sun one, I meant that I didn't see what was wrong with the
additional paragraph Sun added...
*normally* I'm more lucid that that, but those must of been a
particularly bad 17 minutes.
I apologize for that, and promise to get more sleep before trying
On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 08:20, Santiago Vila wrote:
How does it not violate DFSG 9?
How it does? this software != other software
If I, for example, were to write an ad for the software, I'd have to
include that notice in my software.
[ Consider I could write a game that has the purpose and
4 matches
Mail list logo
