Steve == Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Steve It's also grammatically incorrect, and should say asserts
Steve its right. Let's not have Sun come after us all on a
Steve technicality, please. :)
You know, I even left out the apostrophe at first then decided it
looked
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 19 Oct 2002, Brian Nelson wrote:
Kevin Atkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, 19 Oct 2002, Brian Nelson wrote:
I'm working on packaging the new upstream GNU/aspell, and I've
discovered a problem with the (attached) license of the
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 01:30:04AM -0600, John Galt wrote:
Actually it isn't a granting of right, but a Testimonial that those rights
exist. It means that you have recourse if sued to go after the one making
the Testimony for your costs. In Debian, a Testimony that rights exist
has
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 20 Oct 2002, Glenn Maynard wrote:
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 01:30:04AM -0600, John Galt wrote:
Actually it isn't a granting of right, but a Testimonial that those rights
exist. It means that you have recourse if sued to go after the one
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 01:52:18AM -0600, John Galt wrote:
No, it's legal boilerplate. You can't testify to things that AREN'T to
the best of your knowlege. At worst it's redundant.
Okay.
Actually it isn't a granting of right, but a Testimonial that those rights
exist. It means that
On Sun, 20 Oct 2002, Glenn Maynard wrote:
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 01:52:18AM -0600, John Galt wrote:
No, it's legal boilerplate. You can't testify to things that AREN'T to
the best of your knowlege. At worst it's redundant.
Okay.
Actually it isn't a granting of right, but a
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 04:43:19AM -0400, Kevin Atkinson wrote:
Could you be more specific? I am not sure what you are asking.
Okay, I read a bit further: it's a third party saying this. In any case,
it doesn't seem to matter; I doubt a testimony that it's free for
non-commercial use helps
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 05:17:11PM -0700, Stephen Zander wrote:
[...]
provided that: (i) the Linux Ports of the
JDK is not integrated, bundled, combined or associated in any way
with a product,
This still holds, right? I would certainly say that the non-free archive
is associated
Richard == Richard Braakman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Richard On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 05:17:11PM -0700, Stephen Zander
Richard wrote: [...]
provided that: (i) the Linux Ports of the JDK is not
integrated, bundled, combined or associated in any way with a
product,
9 matches
Mail list logo
