On Fri, 2003-04-18 at 13:26, Frank Mittelbach wrote:
> Thomas Bushnell, BSG writes:
>
> > Sure, that's fine. But the LPPL people might not like it, given their
> > weirdness.
>
> thanks a lot, if we are back to abuse then I guess that's about time to stop
Do not take the voice of one as the v
On Wed, 2003-04-16 at 15:09, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 08:12:27PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Anyway, to answer your original question, "GFDL = non-free" is not an
> > official Debian position simply because we haven't written up a proper
> > explanation of why, and have
Thomas Bushnell, BSG writes:
> Sure, that's fine. But the LPPL people might not like it, given their
> weirdness.
thanks a lot, if we are back to abuse then I guess that's about time to stop
happy easter to those who accept it from a weirdo but perhaps that makes it
suspicious
frank
Frank Mittelbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Walter Landry writes:
> > 5a1 is not a free alternative. 5a2 approaches that, but it has to
> > cover _every_ occasion where 5a1 fails, not just most of them.
>
> I don't think it is acceptable that you take a list of "or"s, judge
> each of them ind
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian T. Sniffen) writes:
>
>> c. The Current Maintainer may have included an offering of technical
>>support for his work, labelled "Support Information". You must
>>remove any such offerings, though you may add your o
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian T. Sniffen) writes:
> c. The Current Maintainer may have included an offering of technical
>support for his work, labelled "Support Information". You must
>remove any such offerings, though you may add your own. If there
>is other information regarding suppor
6 matches
Mail list logo
