On Sat, 2003-11-15 at 11:24, Brian T. Sniffen wrote:
The patent prevents you from solving the covered problem, no matter
how you come to that solution. So the unlawfullness of integrating
the patented method into the parsing of your favorite text editor has
nothing to do with the web server.
On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 14:02, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
The act of running the Program is not restricted by the proposed Apache
license either. We don't need to list all of the things that are not
restricted by the license.
It is if your patent license is revoked.
signature.asc
Description:
On Sat, 2003-11-15 at 01:05, Branden Robinson wrote:
I don't know about others, but my notion of software freedom does
include the freedom to compile and use source code.
It didn't violate the patent until I changed the code, though. And even
when changed, it happens to be perfectly free code
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
Well, for the gif problem... I suppose we'll never be able to support
that?
I guess whenever that software patent expires worldwide debian can
happily support gifs.
cheers,
dalibor topic
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 03:13:59AM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
Title 17 USC, Sec. 106.
Look at GPL 2(b) to be licensed as a whole at no charge to all third
parties under the terms of this License. You get your license to use a
GPL program when:
1) The program is licensed that
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 04:30:26PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
Kenshi Muto wrote:
At Tue, 11 Nov 2003 11:59:24 +0100,
Martin Schulze wrote:
Preparation of Debian GNU/Linux 3.0r2
=
An up-to-date version is at http://master.debian.org/~joey/3.0r2/.
Anthony DeRobertis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 14:02, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
The act of running the Program is not restricted by the proposed Apache
license either. We don't need to list all of the things that are not
restricted by the license.
It is if your
On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 10:35, Glenn Maynard wrote:
What about GPL #6? Each time you redistribute the Program (or any work
based on the Program), the recipient automatically receives a license from
the original licensor to copy, distribute or modify the Program subject to
these terms and
On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 12:15, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Anthony DeRobertis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 14:02, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
The act of running the Program is not restricted by the proposed Apache
license either. We don't need to list all of the things that are
Anthony == Anthony DeRobertis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anthony On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 10:35, Glenn Maynard wrote:
What about GPL #6? Each time you redistribute the Program (or
any work based on the Program), the recipient automatically
receives a license from the original
Sam Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
MJ == MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
MJ On 2003-11-15 04:14:44 + Walter Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MJ wrote:
It only revokes the patent license, not the whole license.
Since Debian, to a large extent, only concerns itself with
11 matches
Mail list logo
