"Franck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Hi,
>
>We are currently working on a web-developpement tool for a private
> company.
>
>The people who fund the project are okay to give opensource a try, but
> they insist on some restrictions. (for the business model to be
> sucessful).
>
>Th
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> OK, say I use the X11 license. Now suppose someone installs a closed
>> source plugin. Suppose it also happens that this same user has
>> installed some GPL plugin. Both plugins would be allowed separately,
>> right? When the user runs the program
On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 03:50:50AM +0100, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
> Walter Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> I am working on a piece of free software that makes extensive use of
> >> plugins, i.e. shared objects dynamically loaded at runtime. Many of
> >> these plugins are linked with third-
Walter Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I am working on a piece of free software that makes extensive use of
>> plugins, i.e. shared objects dynamically loaded at runtime. Many of
>> these plugins are linked with third-party libraries. The licenses of
>> those libraries vary, including at l
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Måns Rullgård) wrote:
>
> I am working on a piece of free software that makes extensive use of
> plugins, i.e. shared objects dynamically loaded at runtime. Many of
> these plugins are linked with third-party libraries. The licenses of
> those libraries vary, including at leas
Scripsit Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> It's all in French, which I don't speak a word of, but if "SLIS est
> sous licence GPL" means that the code is licence,
Oops: s/license,/licensed under the GPL,/
--
Henning Makholm"I have seen men with a *fraction* of
Scripsit Frederic Ollivier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The delopper want to translate on Debian.
I'm not sure I can parse this sentence. Surely the developer is free
to use Debian on his development system. (??)
> http://slis.ac-grenoble.fr
> This package can be approved ?
It's all in French, which I
Slis is a frontend to administ a proxy cache server.
It was based at the origne on Linux RedHat, but when RedHat Inc. choose
to pay upgrade.
The delopper want to translate on Debian.
Web site :
http://slis.ac-grenoble.fr
This package can be approved ?
--
I am working on a piece of free software that makes extensive use of
plugins, i.e. shared objects dynamically loaded at runtime. Many of
these plugins are linked with third-party libraries. The licenses of
those libraries vary, including at least GPL, LGPL and X11. Now I'm
trying to work out wh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Küster) wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 01:56:34PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> >> But, most importantly, who is "The Debian Project", which would be
> >> granted the permission, in this sense? Everybody who runs a server with
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 05:39:02PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
>>
>> In effect, the computer program itself (eg, the TrueType part is
>> protected) but the output of the program is not.
>
> So it should be possible to reverse-engineer and reimplemen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 01:56:34PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
>> I guess that permission to distribute would have to include permission
>> to distribute further modified versions, like security fixes, ASAP
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
