Scripsit Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> If the .el source files use copyrightable material from emacs, be it
> copyrightable APIs,
Since when is an API protected by copyright? And where?
--
Henning Makholm"*Jeg* tænker *strax* på kirkemødet i
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 10:54:16PM +0100, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
> Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 07:33:34PM +0100, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
> >> Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> > On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> >> >> Don Armstr
Joey Hess wrote:
> There is a project on sourceforge that has produced a usable set of
> quake WADs. I tried it, it works without needing the shareware WADs,
> and the license is free. I forget the name of the project.
http://openquartz.sourceforge.net/
--
Andrew Saunders
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Sven Luther wrote:
> Yep, upstream has already agreed to modify licence, probably to
> either LGPL or to GPL/LGPL+QPL dual licence. I asked them what do
> they care about dual licence, since the files are no use without
> emacs, and i was told about an hypothetic non-GPLed emac
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 09:30:41PM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> On Jan 12, 2004, at 02:45, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> >>I have some doubts about this, since th GPL is all about distribution,
> >>not use, and since we distribute the .el in source form and have them
> >>compiled on the users syste
Scripsit Ian Beckwith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > (A) The C-Kermit software, in source and/or binary form, may be
> > included WITHOUT EXPLICIT LICENSE in distributions of OPERATING
> > SYSTEMS that have OSI (Open Source Initiative, www.opensource.org)
> > approved licenses, even if non-Op
Scripsit Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> This will be of interest to anyone wanting to follow up on
> unauthorized use of the Debian "swirl" logo. We have a statement from
> its creator that the swirl was created from scratch.
I'm not entirely convinced that his answer is applicable to th
7 matches
Mail list logo
