On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 03:41:56PM -0600, Benjamin Cutler wrote:
I like to think that this can be put in Debian's non-free section given a
slightly clarified license, which was the purpose of my original e-mail,
since I was unable to fully figure out what was covered under what, and
getting
[EMAIL PROTECTED](B
$B!!FCDjh0zK!!FCDjEE;R%a!%kK!$K4p$E$/I=((B
$B(B
$B!!!c%a%k%^%,5BzG[?.$HL$5Bz9-9p$NAw?.TLN!d(B
[EMAIL PROTECTED](B
$B(B
$BFCDjh0zK!!FCDjEE;R%a!%kK!$K4p$E$/I=((B
$B(B $B!!(B
$B!c%a%k%^%,5BzG[?.$HL$5Bz9-9p$NAw?.TLN!d(B
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 14:01:36 +0100 MJ Ray wrote:
On 2004-06-24 10:40:01 +0100 Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Anyway, IMHO, summaries of /license/ analyses are still useful.
Oh, I agree, but I think we need to make a few changes to how they're
being done, now we've seen them
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 04:32:01 -0500 Ryan Rasmussen wrote:
Is the following compliant with Debian's Free Software Guidelines?
---
APPLE PUBLIC SOURCE LICENSE
Version 2.0 - August 6, 2003
Please read this License carefully
On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 10:53:14PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 04:32:01 -0500 Ryan Rasmussen wrote: 13.7 Entire
Agreement; Governing Law. This License constitutes the
entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject
matter hereof. This License shall be
On Sat, 2004-06-26 at 17:23, Andrew Suffield wrote:
Where You are located in the province of Quebec, Canada, the following
clause applies: The parties hereby confirm that they have requested
that this License and all related documents be drafted in English. Les
parties ont exige que
7 matches
Mail list logo
