ACCOUNT DEACTIVATED

2004-12-27 Thread at sunset.backbone.olemiss.edu
This account is no longer active. Thus, your mail regarding "[PMX:VIRUS] Re:" will not be received.

demande d`information.

2004-12-27 Thread Sakho Sory
Bonjour ,,je suis un gagnant des 14 nuits,j`ai deja rempli les conditions mais n ai recu aucun e-mail de confirmation avec un code spécial me permettant d'obtenir mon chèque hôtelier Eurorest pour des nuits d'hôtel gratuites.Expliquez ou dites moi quelque chose.Sakho Découvrez le nouveau Yahoo!

Re: Questions about legal theory behind (L)GPL

2004-12-27 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Michael K. Edwards wrote: On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 14:46:43 -0500, Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Warning: IANAL. IANAL either. Just interested (at least in the non-legal sense). 1) The (L)GPL is legally an offer of contract, right? It was claimed during the debian-devel discus

Re: GPL License question

2004-12-27 Thread Anthony W. Youngman
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Josh Triplett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes Tom deL wrote: A product has piqued my interest and claims to be GPL but the disclaimers and general tone of their license "explanation" gives me pause. Any opinions of how truly "open source" this project is would be grea

Re: LCC and blobs

2004-12-27 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 09:22:42PM -0500, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote: > Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I think there are parallels with other software in Debian where we have > > not been so forgiving. We have a number of emulators for game consoles > > that are packaged and current

Re: GPL License question

2004-12-27 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 08:56:22PM +, Anthony W. Youngman wrote: > The output of gcc is > not covered by the licence that covers gcc. That's not strictly true. The license of gcc explicitly permits any and all use of any code generated by gcc, and makes no restrictions on it. There's no answ

Re: LCC and blobs

2004-12-27 Thread Benjamin A'Lee
On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 11:06:53AM +1100 or thereabouts, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > Yes, of course. So, we could technically distribute ROMs for atari800 if > we found some that met the DFSG, and then we could move atari800 to > main. We could technically distribute an ICQ server if we had one that >

Microsoft Office 2003 - very low price

2004-12-27 Thread Alice A . Walker
Get access to all the software you need for bottom prices!We sell software 2-6 times cheaper than retail price.Examples:$70 Windows XP Professional (Including: Service Pack 2)$80 Microsoft Office 2003 Professional$90 Adobe Photoshop 8.0/CS (Including: Imag

Re: GPL License question

2004-12-27 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 12:46:09AM +, Andrew Suffield wrote: > On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 08:56:22PM +, Anthony W. Youngman wrote: > > The output of gcc is > > not covered by the licence that covers gcc. > > That's not strictly true. The license of gcc explicitly permits any > and all use of

Re: LCC and blobs

2004-12-27 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 12:48:14AM +, Benjamin A'Lee wrote: > On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 11:06:53AM +1100 or thereabouts, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > Yes, of course. So, we could technically distribute ROMs for atari800 if > > we found some that met the DFSG, and then we could move atari800 to > >

Re: LCC and blobs

2004-12-27 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 09:45:32PM -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote: > Right: some emulators are fairly useless without some kind of image (eg. a > BIOS image), just as some drivers are fairly useless without some kind of > image (eg. a firmware blob). If all of the pieces were packaged, foo-driver > wo

Re: LCC and blobs

2004-12-27 Thread Raul Miller
On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 04:26:26PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > Yet the ICQ client is not useful without a component which is not in > Debian and in fact is not freely available. Same thing applies to hardware drivers. And, for that matter, all of the kernel. -- Raul