This account is no longer active. Thus, your
mail regarding "[PMX:VIRUS] Re:" will not be received.
Bonjour ,,je suis un gagnant des 14 nuits,j`ai deja rempli les conditions mais n ai recu aucun e-mail de confirmation avec un code spécial me permettant d'obtenir mon chèque hôtelier Eurorest pour des nuits d'hôtel gratuites.Expliquez ou dites moi quelque chose.Sakho
Découvrez le nouveau Yahoo!
Michael K. Edwards wrote:
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 14:46:43 -0500, Nathanael Nerode
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Warning: IANAL.
IANAL either. Just interested (at least in the non-legal sense).
1) The (L)GPL is legally an offer of contract, right?
It was claimed during the debian-devel discus
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Josh Triplett
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
Tom deL wrote:
A product has piqued my interest and claims to be GPL but the disclaimers
and general tone of their license "explanation" gives me pause.
Any opinions of how truly "open source" this project is would be grea
On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 09:22:42PM -0500, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote:
> Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I think there are parallels with other software in Debian where we have
> > not been so forgiving. We have a number of emulators for game consoles
> > that are packaged and current
On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 08:56:22PM +, Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
> The output of gcc is
> not covered by the licence that covers gcc.
That's not strictly true. The license of gcc explicitly permits any
and all use of any code generated by gcc, and makes no restrictions on
it.
There's no answ
On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 11:06:53AM +1100 or thereabouts, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> Yes, of course. So, we could technically distribute ROMs for atari800 if
> we found some that met the DFSG, and then we could move atari800 to
> main. We could technically distribute an ICQ server if we had one that
>
Get access to all the software you need for
bottom prices!We sell software 2-6 times cheaper than retail
price.Examples:$70 Windows XP Professional (Including: Service Pack
2)$80 Microsoft Office 2003 Professional$90 Adobe Photoshop 8.0/CS
(Including: Imag
On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 12:46:09AM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 08:56:22PM +, Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
> > The output of gcc is
> > not covered by the licence that covers gcc.
>
> That's not strictly true. The license of gcc explicitly permits any
> and all use of
On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 12:48:14AM +, Benjamin A'Lee wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 11:06:53AM +1100 or thereabouts, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > Yes, of course. So, we could technically distribute ROMs for atari800 if
> > we found some that met the DFSG, and then we could move atari800 to
> >
On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 09:45:32PM -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> Right: some emulators are fairly useless without some kind of image (eg. a
> BIOS image), just as some drivers are fairly useless without some kind of
> image (eg. a firmware blob). If all of the pieces were packaged, foo-driver
> wo
On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 04:26:26PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> Yet the ICQ client is not useful without a component which is not in
> Debian and in fact is not freely available.
Same thing applies to hardware drivers. And, for that matter, all of
the kernel.
--
Raul
12 matches
Mail list logo