On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 09:58:00AM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote:
Interpreters are a different issue from the exec() situation. The
program being interpreted generally does not communicate with the
interpreter at all.
If the interpreted program and the interpreter can't communicate, then
usually
On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 01:50:58PM +, Andres Baravalle wrote:
I suppose that it would mean excluding *all* the syndicated comics
(dilbert, calvin and hobbes etc.). They cover 2/3 of the comics.
They will not give me an explicit permission, but I'd like to know if
I'm doing anything wrong
Raul Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 09:58:00AM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote:
Interpreters are a different issue from the exec() situation. The
program being interpreted generally does not communicate with the
interpreter at all.
If the interpreted program and the
Gervase Markham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[MJR sceptical that this sort of branding bug gets fixed quickly]
To be honest (and I wrote the code in Bugzilla which does the
reporting), that's more to prevent anonymous DOS, because they are very
processor intensive. If you want to see them and
Michael Poole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Walter Landry writes:
Debian adds in all of the debian-specific control files, including man
pages. Even if you discount that, Debian reserves the right to modify
Kaffe at will.
Debian-created man pages, or any other modifications of Kaffe, could
5 matches
Mail list logo
