On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 07:18:37AM +0100, Alban browaeys wrote:
> I would say that debian does not treat trademark as a licence. Else we
> could not release with the debian "release" logo , nor the debian
> trademarked name.
> That would be pretty cool :)
That's broken reasoning; it's like saying
I would say that debian does not treat trademark as a licence. Else we
could not release with the debian "release" logo , nor the debian
trademarked name.
That would be pretty cool :)
I am out of laugh thinking of we tellling the release manager "ehrm
sorry we have an RC on debian, it is not free.
On 22 Feb 2005 15:07:32 GMT MJ Ray wrote:
> I think your general point is correct, but the concrete example is
> not fine at the moment, according to http://www.uk.debian.org/logos/
> and the copyright statement shown there. This is a bug.
But, as Martin said, it's being worked on.
--
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:51:57 + Lewis Jardine wrote:
> If this is the case, then Debian could make itself easy to rebrand by
> ensuring that all uses of the Debian logo to brand the distribution
> are in one location; distributing it is fine, so no-one would have to
> worry about accidentally
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 08:25:06 + Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > With this in mind, I would say Debian wants to stay in the former
> > kind of trademark encumbered works...
> > Thus, no trademarked logos in main or contrib, right?
Just to clarify, here I was referring to trademarked *Debian* logos.
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 03:31:22AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> Joel Aelwyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...]
> > "You may not have any cookies right now".
> >
> > It's a reflexive negation rewording of "May I " -> "You may not ".
> [snip]
>
> Well, that's fine, but if I don't need your permission in or
Eike Dehling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[snip]
> As stated on their website:
>
>
> " Spin is distributed in source form to encourage research in formal
> verification, and to help a
> support friendly and open exchange of algorithms, ideas, and tools. The
> software itself has a
> copyright fro
Lewis Jardine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would I be correct in saying that as long as copyright is not infringed,
> it is fine to distribute art that is used as a trademark, as long as
> you do not use it as a trademark. As a concrete example, if I were to
> distribute 'foo Linux', that contai
* MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-01-26 03:29]:
> I think that http://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/ is a mistake which
> should be removed or drastically changed. It divides debian-legal and
> has been a gift to those who always seek to criticise contributors on
> more than one occasion. Can you
Jacobo Tarrio wrote:
O Martes, 22 de Febreiro de 2005 Ãs 13:54:18 +0100, Eike Dehling escribÃa:
isn't commercial, so it doesn't apply here. The first sentence even
encourages redistribution/modification, i'd think? How much of a problem
is the restriction on commercial use, when non-commercial us
Matthew Palmer wrote:
Is what was quoted above the sum total of the "permission text" that comes
with spin? I don't see anything in what you quoted above which gives the
right to modify and/or redistribute spin. It says "Spin is distributed in
source form to encourage research in formal verificat
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 10:28:32PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 21:12:37 + Andrew Suffield wrote:
Formally stated, it's approximately "trademarks cannot make a work
strictly non-free, but you may have to replace all instances of the
trademark with something else". Depending
Eike Dehling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> " Spin is distributed in source form to encourage research in formal
> verification, and to help a support friendly and open exchange of
> algorithms, ideas, and tools. The software itself has a copyright from
> Lucent Technologies and Bell Laboratories
O Martes, 22 de Febreiro de 2005 ás 13:54:18 +0100, Eike Dehling escribía:
> So unless someone uses it commercially no license applies. Debian itself
A license is a permission grant. No license == no permission.
> isn't commercial, so it doesn't apply here. The first sentence even
> encourage
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 01:54:18PM +0100, Eike Dehling wrote:
> " Spin is distributed in source form to encourage research in formal
> verification, and to help a support friendly and open exchange of
> algorithms, ideas, and tools. The software itself has a copyright from
> Lucent Technologies
Glenn Maynard wrote:
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 02:31:03AM +0100, Eike Dehling wrote:
* Package name: spin
* URL : http://www.spinroot.com/
* License : Free(as in, no license) for non-commercial use, commercial
use requires this license:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 10:28:32PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 21:12:37 + Andrew Suffield wrote:
>
> > Formally stated, it's approximately "trademarks cannot make a work
> > strictly non-free, but you may have to replace all instances of the
> > trademark with something
17 matches
Mail list logo
