It's pretty lame that in your crusade for user freedom, you seek to
take away the last right the developer has -- being credited for his
work. What a joke you have become.
--
Chris
"With the way things are starting to go in this country, if forced to
choose between being caught with a van full
MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've been reading around http://www.lehrer-online.de/
> (forgive me, but German law textbooks are not easy to obtain
> quickly in the fens) under Recht: Ausf. Info.: Schulhomepage:
> illegale Inhalte and it looks like unclear cases like ours are
> only punishab
On Fri, 1 Jul 2005 20:36:51 -0400 Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 12:17:43AM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > Wait one second...
> > Of course excision is possible, but is it really a good idea?
> > I don't think so.
>
> That's not d-legal's decision, or the DPL's. It's the mainta
Bug dropped, as this matter is resolved, posted to d-l only.
First off, I'd like to thank the several people in this discussion who
do have contributed intelligently and meaningfully to the conversation
and supported a reasonable resolution, including Michael K. Edwards,
Rick Moen, Francesco Poli
On Sat, 02 Jul 2005 15:32:50 +0200 Michael Below wrote:
> The Wolfenstein case has the additional problem that the game contains
> lots of swastikas and other nazi symbols, which are banned in
> Germany. Using these banned symbols (outside of history education) is
> what the cited No. 2 of the JMS
Hi!
* Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050702 17:00]:
> > The Wolfenstein case has the additional problem that the game contains
> > lots of swastikas and other nazi symbols, which are banned in
> > Germany. Using these banned symbols (outside of history education) is
> > what the cited No. 2 o
6 matches
Mail list logo
