Hi,
I agree with most of what you said, except I'd like clarification on
this part:
On Sun, Jul 24, 2005, Jeff Licquia wrote:
The copyright of the rest of GStreamer depends on how it's distributed.
In Debian, it's clear that GStreamer is distributed with MAD support,
which makes its
On Saturday, 23 Jul 2005 10:28:05 -7.00, Sean Kellogg wrote:
On Saturday 23 July 2005 02:40 am, Arnoud Engelfriet wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a few questions about software developement. One of them is
whether a program written in e.g. Fortran by me or somebody else (who
Hi all,
Some days ago I asked about the viability the idea of creating a new
architecture of Debian using the OpenSolaris stack.
I got a reply complaining and pointing out some problems about the
CDDL license, which I understood like a CDDL rejection from Debian.
Now, I have got this
Agreed, and in the vast majority of the cases the translation is
a creative work. A babelfish translation would be a literal
translation.
an f2c translation is a literal (automatic) translation, so it's not a creative
work. The copyrights of the original work apply to the translated work
On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 11:59 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
GStreamer's build process builds separate binaries for the various
plugins, these are then dlopened when requested.
I would personnally think that installing only Debian's GStreamer
packages that are linked to LGPL libraries doesn't
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 01:25:27PM -0700, Michael K. Edwards wrote:
On 7/16/05, Diego Biurrun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please remember that this is my answer to your question of what _I_ would
do, I didn't say what Debian should do.
[...}
But you're telling me you won't at least call
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 05:54:40PM -0700, Michael K. Edwards wrote:
Do you really think it's fair to characterize as pro-patenters
people who are simply pointing out:
the absence of a public policy rationale for denying the same
sort of encouragement to applied researchers (and their
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Francesco
Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
In the countries where moral rights apply, the Licensor
waives his right to exercise his moral right to the extent allowed by
law in order to make effective the licence of the economic rights here
above listed.
This seems to
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 22:11:35 +0100 Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
Actually, I didn't read it that way at all ... if moral rights get in
the way of this licence, then this licence takes precedence.
AFAIK, this is impossible at the moment.
Since moral rights are inalienable, it is my understanding
9 matches
Mail list logo
