Re: Rules for submitting licenses for review

2005-08-18 Thread Francesco Poli
On 18 Aug 2005 17:42:47 GMT MJ Ray wrote: [...] > > Could I submit a license for > > review just for my own personal interest and even though it is > > unlikely said license will ever be used in debian free or non-free? > > You could, but you will probably get a lower response. Please > try more

Re: May be non-copyrighted documment included in main?

2005-08-18 Thread Francesco Poli
On 18 Aug 2005 17:37:05 GMT MJ Ray wrote: > As such, the permission granted to copy it and use any part with > attribution is needed and might be sufficient With no permission to modify? Have I missed something? -- :-( This Universe is buggy! Where's the Creator's BTS? ;-) .

Re: May be non-copyrighted documment included in main?

2005-08-18 Thread Don Armstrong
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Petr Gajdusek wrote: > The only notice in the documment says: > > "This publication is not copyrighted. One can copy it and use any > part of it with mentioning the source. Publishers ask only for > information about it." This notice makes no sense at all. Either the document

Re: May be non-copyrighted documment included in main?

2005-08-18 Thread Måns Rullgård
MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Petr Gajdusek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The only notice in the documment says: >> "This publication is not copyrighted. One can copy it and use any part >> of it with mentioning the source. Publishers ask only for information >> about it." >> >> Is this su

Re: Rules for submitting licenses for review

2005-08-18 Thread MJ Ray
Ricardo Gladwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm new to this list and I'm planning to submit a license for review. > I'm not sure of the procedure for doing so: I know I should send the > entire text of the license in the body of my email, but what other > rules are there and what is the scope? T

Re: May be non-copyrighted documment included in main?

2005-08-18 Thread MJ Ray
Petr Gajdusek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The only notice in the documment says: > "This publication is not copyrighted. One can copy it and use any part > of it with mentioning the source. Publishers ask only for information > about it." > > Is this sufficient to include publication in main sect

May be non-copyrighted documment included in main?

2005-08-18 Thread Petr Gajdusek
The only notice in the documment says: "This publication is not copyrighted. One can copy it and use any part of it with mentioning the source. Publishers ask only for information about it." Is this sufficient to include publication in main section? Thank you for answer. Petr Gajdusek -- To

Re: Rules for submitting licenses for review

2005-08-18 Thread Evan Prodromou
On Thu, 2005-18-08 at 12:10 +0100, Ricardo Gladwell wrote: > Could I submit a license for > review just for my own personal interest and even though it is > unlikely said license will ever be used in debian free or non-free? Please don't. ~Evan -- Evan Prodromou [EMAIL PROTECTED] "By God! I wi

Rules for submitting licenses for review

2005-08-18 Thread Ricardo Gladwell
Hi, I'm new to this list and I'm planning to submit a license for review. I'm not sure of the procedure for doing so: I know I should send the entire text of the license in the body of my email, but what other rules are there and what is the scope? Could I submit a license for review just for my o