"Lionel Elie Mamane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 09:12:37AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
Asheesh Laroia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There are some murmurings on the Web (e.g.,
http://www.spatula.net/software/sex/ ,
http://packages.gentoo.org/eb
Asheesh Laroia wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> >Many countries have copyright for databases; I think the whole EU has
> >it.
>
> Would a "database" as small as this file be covered? I personally doubt
> it, but I don't know how "database copyrights" are defined generall
I've talked with the author of Vigra of the licencing problems
(http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/09/msg00515.html), and it seems
reading to change the licence.
Here is the mail he sent to me :
-- Message transmis --
Subject: Re: [VIGRA] Licencing problem between Hugin
Lewis Jardine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> MJ Ray wrote:
> > http://www.spatula.net/software/sex/ says "Original author unknown.
> > Presumably this is public domain by now." Anyone know why they
> > presume that? [...]
>
> Possibly they're thinking it was public-domained when the author posted
>
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 07:17:30PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> People who see that it is a problem have to take up the gauntlet;
> Indeed, one could ask what the contributors to this thread have been
> doing to speed this process along...
I'm open for suggestions on what else I _can_ do to help.
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 07:17:30PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> I'm not interested in stalling the migration process until the authors
> for all of the pages in question have been contacted.
Luckily, the work so far on the migration process has been on the
conversion scripts. If the resolution of
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 09:12:37AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> Asheesh Laroia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> There are some murmurings on the Web (e.g.,
>> http://www.spatula.net/software/sex/ ,
>> http://packages.gentoo.org/ebuilds/?sex-1.0 ) from people who believe that
>> it
>> is BSD-licensed, b
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 03:37:21PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Sat, 01 Oct 2005, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > * Consequently, its source code should be (easily) available for
> > download
>
> It would actually just be better to expose the actual on disk storage
> that moin-moin uses (whatever th
MJ Ray wrote:
Asheesh Laroia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There are some murmurings on the Web (e.g.,
http://www.spatula.net/software/sex/ ,
http://packages.gentoo.org/ebuilds/?sex-1.0 ) from people who believe that it
is BSD-licensed, but in truth I have been able to find no license.
http://
Asheesh Laroia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think it's possible that the short strings in this program are
> uncopyrightable since they're so short, and since there is no copyright for
> databases the collection as a group isn't copyrightable either. (Like fortune
> quotes.) But I'm not a law
On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 06:26:23PM -0400, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
I think it's possible that the short strings in this program are
uncopyrightable since they're so short, and since there is no copyright
for databases the collection as a group isn't
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 06:26:23PM -0400, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
> I think it's possible that the short strings in this program are
> uncopyrightable since they're so short, and since there is no
> copyright for databases the collection as a group isn't
> copyrightable either.
Many countries have
12 matches
Mail list logo
