Scripsit Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Copyright Holder:
>
> This has to include a copyright year, also. Please update the
> boilerplace to indicate that. Also, the copyright holder is not
> necessarily the author.
Ideally, the copyright file should reproduce the exact copyright
notice
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 03:53:48AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > And what would be good license for Debians web pages? (This is about
> > content, the scripts used in generation are GNU GPL or otherwise
> > freely licensed.)
>
> Either GNU GPL v. 2 or 2-clause BSD or MIT/Expat. Author's choi
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 11:42:16AM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Copyright Holder:
> >
> > This has to include a copyright year, also. Please update the
> > boilerplace to indicate that. Also, the copyright holder is not
> > necessarily the a
As part of my "day job," I'm working on a piece of Debian-specific software.
I would like to release it under the GPL and the company is receptive, but
we're not sure about the exact mechanism we should use.
Obviously, since it was written using their time and resources, they hold
copyright on it.
John Morrissey said on Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 10:55:27AM -0500,:
> I'm wondering what kind of documentation we should have that
> explicitly authorizes me to release this software (copyright still
> held by the company) to the public under a DFSG compliant license.
This is answered in th
Lewis Jardine wrote:
> > 1) Is it legal?
>
> I can't answer that one (and even if I could, I'd probably be wrong or
> overlook something).
> If you're planning on using this license for something important, you should
> probably
> see a contract lawyer with qualifications in French and Americ
John Morrissey wrote:
> I'm wondering what kind of documentation we should have that explicitly
> authorizes me to release this software (copyright still held by the company)
> to the public under a DFSG compliant license.
The easiest solution in my eyes would be that they give you one copy,
with
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 09:23:40PM +0100, Arnoud Engelfriet wrote:
> John Morrissey wrote:
> > I'm wondering what kind of documentation we should have that explicitly
> > authorizes me to release this software (copyright still held by the company)
> > to the public under a DFSG compliant license.
I
Justin Pryzby writes:
> On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 09:23:40PM +0100, Arnoud Engelfriet wrote:
>> John Morrissey wrote:
>> > I'm wondering what kind of documentation we should have that explicitly
>> > authorizes me to release this software (copyright still held by the
>> > company)
>> > to the publi
On Wed, 2005-02-11 at 10:55 -0500, John Morrissey wrote:
As part of my "day job," I'm working on a piece of Debian-specific software.
I would like to release it under the GPL and the company is receptive [...]
Good for them and good for you.
Obviously, since it was written using their tim
Thank you for subscribing. You have now unsubscribed and no more messages will
be sent.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
11 matches
Mail list logo
