Justin Pryzby wrote:
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 09:23:40PM +0100, Arnoud Engelfriet wrote:
John Morrissey wrote:
I'm wondering what kind of documentation we should have that explicitly
authorizes me to release this software (copyright still held by the
company)
to the public under a
As part of my day job, I'm working on a piece of Debian-specific software.
I would like to release it under the GPL and the company is receptive, but
we're not sure about the exact mechanism we should use.
That's a 'work for hire'.
Obviously, since it was written using their time and
Emmanuel Colbus wrote:
My main concern about this was that such relicensed copies
could have been considered not free, but undistributable, as the GPL is
supposed to apply to
software, not to documents.
Any collection of bits is software. The GPL works very well for any
collection of bits.
On 11/4/05, Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Emmanuel Colbus wrote:
My main concern about this was that such relicensed copies
could have been considered not free, but undistributable, as the GPL is
supposed to apply to
software, not to documents.
Any collection of bits is
4 matches
Mail list logo
