Hi,
I'm packaging a set of Glk user interface libraries [1], which are
distributed under a custom license, included below. In my limited
understanding this is both DFSG-free and GPL-compatible, but I'd like
to be sure about this. The libraries are going to be linked against
GPL- and BSD-licensed
On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 00:40:31 -0500 Justin Pryzby wrote:
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 11:30:03PM -0600, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
[...]
Are you saying it's possible for a developer to release GPL covered
software in binary form without releasing the source code as long as
he's the copyright
Raul Miller wrote:
On 11/4/05, Lewis Jardine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(Tangentially, could someone please clarify this: to pass on the work
dual-licensed, do you need to comply with both licenses, or does the
copyright statement attached to the work that you've legitimately
distributed under
Lewis Jardine wrote:
what you want to do is distribute it so that whoever received it also
has the option of choosing GPL or MPL.
If you were to pick either GPL or MPL, and not modify the work, does the
recipient only have your choice of licence to pick from, or can they
still choose
Scripsit Lewis Jardine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you were to pick either GPL or MPL, and not modify the work, does
the recipient only have your choice of licence to pick from, or can
they still choose either?
They can still choose either. In the case of both the GPL and the MPL
alike, the grant of
Scripsit Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 11:30:03PM -0600, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
Are you saying it's possible for a developer to release GPL covered
software in binary form without releasing the source code as long as
he's the copyright holder? That sounds awfully
Niko Tyni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The source code in this package is copyright 1998-9 by Andrew Plotkin. You
may copy and distribute it freely, by any means and under any conditions,
as long as the code and documentation is not changed. You may also
incorporate this code into your own
Niko Tyni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[1] http://www.eblong.com/zarf/glk/
Ah. Zarf. Quite a fascinating fellow. :)
The source code in this package is copyright 1998-9 by Andrew Plotkin. You
may copy and distribute it freely, by any means and under any
Francisco Poli wrote:
I agree on everything you said, with the following comments/questions:
* why do you suggest repeating program name everywhere?
Ah. The reason I did that was so that it would be suitable to print out
and have the company lawyers or executives sign.
I think it
makes
On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 06:47:03AM +1100, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
On 11/5/05, Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 06:28:02PM +1100, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
On 11/4/05, Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Emmanuel Colbus wrote:
My main concern about
10 matches
Mail list logo
