Re: Proposed license for IETF Contributions

2005-11-20 Thread Simon Josefsson
"Joe Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > s/specifically imply/specifically implies/ > s/Internet Standard/an Internet Standard/ Fixed, thanks! > I would also personally change the important sentance to this (changes > marked by *'s): > > This specifically *implies* that *a modified version* >

Re: Proposed license for IETF Contributions

2005-11-20 Thread Simon Josefsson
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Hi all. I have discussed an issue with IETF's copying conditions on >> debian-devel before, and got several supporters. My effort to change >> the copying conditions in IETF has resulted in an updated version of >> my proposed legal license, > That

Re: Sun Developer Network source code license - "

2005-11-20 Thread Michael Poole
tony mancill writes: > Dear Debian Legal, > > I'm working on a package that includes a source file from a tutorial on > the Sun Developer's Network. The source file is not explicitly > licensed, so it falls under the catch-all license link [1] that Sun > publishes at the bottom of all of their p

Sun Developer Network source code license - "

2005-11-20 Thread tony mancill
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear Debian Legal, I'm working on a package that includes a source file from a tutorial on the Sun Developer's Network. The source file is not explicitly licensed, so it falls under the catch-all license link [1] that Sun publishes at the bottom of a

Re: Releasing SW under GPL

2005-11-20 Thread Joe Smith
"Svante Signell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 14:05 -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: Justin Pryzby wrote: > Some argue > that *.h, at least for libraries, have no creative content, or are > only API, and thus not copyrightable, but it can't h

Re: Proposed license for IETF Contributions

2005-11-20 Thread Joe Smith
"Simon Josefsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi all. I have discussed an issue with IETF's copying conditions on debian-devel before, and got several supporters. My effort to change the copying conditions in IETF has resulted in an updated version of my propos

Re: Proposed license for IETF Contributions

2005-11-20 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Simon Josefsson wrote: > Hi all. I have discussed an issue with IETF's copying conditions on > debian-devel before, and got several supporters. My effort to change > the copying conditions in IETF has resulted in an updated version of > my proposed legal license, That means the IETF people lik

Opinions on the PDL

2005-11-20 Thread Daniel Carrera
Hello, A few months ago I asked for opinions on the Public Documentation License (http://www.openoffice.org/licenses/PDL.html) and I got two interesting responses: http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/03/msg00236.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/03/msg00260.html In addition t