Re: GR Proposal: GFDL statement

2006-01-10 Thread Alexander (Sasha) Wait
On 1/10/06, Benj. Mako Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > That pipeline will almost certainly be GFDL/CC-BY-SA. It's really sad > > to see blood boil over these licenses. Since I am talking to people > > at FSF & CC regularly, I would be more than happy to bring Debian > > concerns to both gr

Re: GR Proposal: GFDL statement

2006-01-10 Thread Benj. Mako Hill
> That pipeline will almost certainly be GFDL/CC-BY-SA. It's really sad > to see blood boil over these licenses. Since I am talking to people > at FSF & CC regularly, I would be more than happy to bring Debian > concerns to both groups in a, hopefuly, productive fashion.If > there's a desire

Re: GR Proposal: GFDL statement

2006-01-10 Thread Nathanael Nerode
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm > also working with Wikipedia, CC, & FSF on licensing issues. I'm an > academic scientist. I run a 70 processor cluster (Debian stable & > OpenSSI.) I do synthetic biology. I work on Personal Genomics; my > mentor's article about the work is the cover story for