"Francesco Poli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and that was a clearly DFSG-free choice.
I'm personally very happy with that choice and feel it's a perfectly
adequate license for videos.
True that does seem strange.
As a sidenote, the URL you quoted points to th
Academic Free License 2.1 has been discussed here before and is
IIRC non-free, how about version 1.1? License follows:
Academic Free License
Version 1.1
This Academic Free License applies to any original work of authorship (the
"Original Work") whose owner (the "Licensor") has placed the followin
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006 14:42:00 +0100 Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
Hi!
[...]
> I would like to inform you about a licence change I propose for those
> and other videos, and am highly interesting in your thoughts about
> this.
>
> Before FOSDEM, all videos were released under a MIT-style licence.
an
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Simon Josefsson wrote:
Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
1.1 Software License
Permission is granted for all uses, commercial and non-commercial, of
the sample code found in Section 8. Royalty free license to use,
copy, modify and distribute the software foun
Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi. A newly approved IETF document contains reference code for SHA-2,
> and they propose to use the following license:
>
> 1.1 License
>
>Royalty free license to copy and use this software is granted,
>provided that redistributed derivative wo
Damyan Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asked for comments on:
> * 0. Definitions
>
> o 0.1. IBPP
> 'IBPP' is primarily a set of programming interfaces,
> initially written in the C++ language, which makes it easier to develop
> any other programming work which need to communic
Francesco Poli wrote:
> Apart from clause 3.1 (which must be dropped anyway, if DFSG-freeness is
> sought), this license seems to try to grant a set of permissions not too
> different from the ones granted by the Expat a.k.a. MIT license
> (http://www.jclark.com/xml/copying.txt).
>
> If I were you
Hi,
you might have got this email because I bcc:ed you because you gave a talk at
FOSDEM or operated the video camera there.
I would like to inform you about a licence change I propose for those and
other videos, and am highly interesting in your thoughts about this.
Before FOSDEM, all videos
8 matches
Mail list logo
