-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Josh Triplett wrote:
> Damyan Ivanov wrote:
>
>>=== The problematic? clause ===
>>Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person or
>>organization (”You”) obtaining a copy of this software and associated
>>documentation fi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Mar 2006 09:48:53 +0300 Damyan Ivanov wrote:
>>Please bear in mind
>>that IBPP is really to be used in FlameRobin's packaging, not by
>>itself.
>
> I see, but imagine which permissions someone would get, if he/she wa
Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 05:31:11PM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm struggling with the policy requirement that the copyright and
>> licensing information must be in one file debian/copyright, including
>> the complete license text except for
On Sat, 1 Apr 2006 09:37:34 +0200 Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 08:40:55PM -0800, Josh Triplett
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > According to Gervase Markham, the mozilla relicensing process has
> > now completed; all source files now fall under the GPL, LGPL, and
> > MPL:
>
> ...
On Sat, 01 Apr 2006 12:00:25 +0300 Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> I beleive this is not a problem, since the
> FlameRobin package would satisfy both licensing (original Expath and
> this modified thingy - the IBPP license) and the Social contract. I
> mention SC, because of this text: "We promise that the
On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 12:39:39PM +0200, Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Apr 2006 09:37:34 +0200 Mike Hommey wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 08:40:55PM -0800, Josh Triplett
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > According to Gervase Markham, the mozilla relicensing proce
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Marco d'Itri wrote:
>> You first need to show that there are bugs and that the precedent
>> decisions are wrong. So far nobody actually managed to do this.
>The MPL (section 3.2) requires that source code remain available for 12
>after initial distribution or 6 months af
Francesco Poli wrote:
> I think that this is good news anyway.
> Thanks to Gervase Markham for dealing with this (big) issue!
You are welcome :-) Perhaps now I can get back to hacking :-)
Gerv
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMA
Scripsit Josh Triplett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> According to Gervase Markham, the mozilla relicensing process has now
> completed; all source files now fall under the GPL, LGPL, and MPL:
> http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/gerv/archives/2006/03/relicensing_complete.html
And there was much rejoicing. Ku
On 4/1/06, Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Snapshot.debian.net does not help because Debian made legally
> responsible for ensuring the code remains available by the MPL, and as
> we know all to well snapshot.d.n is not invincible.]
True enough. However, once snapshot.debian.net
10 matches
Mail list logo