Re: main or contrib?

2006-10-28 Thread Marco d'Itri
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Various programs in main behave markedly different in the absence of >certain proprietary network server software -- IM client programs come >to mind. Do those bits need to be removed from main? I remember that this was settled on debian-policy@ long ago (debian-legal@ d

Re: main or contrib?

2006-10-28 Thread Marco d'Itri
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >"is the same program" != "functionality does not change" If the code being executed is exactly the same then I cannot see how it could provide different functions. This sounds too much like magic to me. -- ciao, Marco -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wit

Re: main or contrib?

2006-10-28 Thread Michael Poole
Marco d'Itri writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>Various programs in main behave markedly different in the absence of >>certain proprietary network server software -- IM client programs come >>to mind. Do those bits need to be removed from main? > I remember that this was settled on debian-pol

Re: main or contrib?

2006-10-28 Thread Marco d'Itri
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >As far as I can tell, [1] is the only thread that predates -legal and >touches on this issue. As far as it comes to a conclusion, it is that This was not the thread. >bits that depend on non-main packages must go into contrib or >non-free. This is consistent with the m

3-clause BSD with additional disclaimers

2006-10-28 Thread Francesco Poli
Hi all! :) I filed a RFP wishlist bug about a very interesting scientific/technical data visualizer called VisIt (see bug #395573 [1]). Its license is a 3-clause BSD license with some additional disclaimers; it can be read here[2] and is fully quoted below for future reference. IMO, this license

Re: 3-clause BSD with additional disclaimers

2006-10-28 Thread Tim Post
On Sat, 2006-10-28 at 18:14 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > Hi all! :) > > I filed a RFP wishlist bug about a very interesting scientific/technical > data visualizer called VisIt (see bug #395573 [1]). > > Its license is a 3-clause BSD license with some additional disclaimers; > it can be read he

Re: main or contrib?

2006-10-28 Thread Michael Poole
Marco d'Itri writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>As far as I can tell, [1] is the only thread that predates -legal and >>touches on this issue. As far as it comes to a conclusion, it is that > This was not the thread. > >>bits that depend on non-main packages must go into contrib or >>non-free

Message refusé: Virus / Mail rejected: Vi rus

2006-10-28 Thread postmaster14_Snecma
Le message a été détruit car il a été identifié comme porteur d'un virus. Notez que certains virus sont capables d'usurper votre adresse de messagerie et que vous êtes susceptibles de recevoir des notifications de ce type à tort. A virus has been found in the email. Please note that your ema