Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Nov 2006 18:38:34 +0100 Arnoud Engelfriet wrote:
> > But if I release a .ps file, it would be output from
> > LaTeX and so it seems reasonable to insist that the software isn't
> > free until the .tex file is available.
>
> In cases where the PostScript file is ge
On Thu, 2 Nov 2006 09:37:19 +0100 Arnoud Engelfriet wrote:
> Francesco Poli wrote:
> > On Wed, 1 Nov 2006 18:38:34 +0100 Arnoud Engelfriet wrote:
> > > But if I release a .ps file, it would be output from
> > > LaTeX and so it seems reasonable to insist that the software isn't
> > > free until the
Arnoud Engelfriet wrote:
> That's what I would think. But consider this example. I write texts
> in a homebrewed XML format, which makes little sense for anyone but
> me. Obviously I prefer to use that format. I have an XSLT
> transformation to make it HTML, and I distribute that HTML version of
>
Is the following license, displayed as a precondition for downloading the
software, DFSG-free? (Specifically, are there any traps in it that I am
not seeing?)
(NB. This "links" is a programming language implementation, not a version
of the web browser by the same name.)
License Agreement
In do
On Fri, 03 Nov 2006, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> Is the following license, displayed as a precondition for
> downloading the software, DFSG-free? (Specifically, are there any
> traps in it that I am not seeing?)
Since (or assuming) it actually is GPLed, you can totally ignore the
clickwrap. Si
On Thu, 02 Nov 2006, Don Armstrong wrote:
> By viewing the source, for example, and constructing a url which
> bypasses the clickwrap entirely, or have someone else distribute the
> source to you under the GPL.
perl -MWWW::Mechanize -e 'my $m = WWW::Mechanize->new();
$m->get(q(http://www.inf.ed.a
Don Armstrong wrote:
> Since (or assuming) it actually is GPLed, you can totally ignore the
> clickwrap. Simply arrange[1] to have the code distributed to you
> simply under the terms of the GPL. [If it's not possible to ignore the
> clickwrap entirely, then it's not actually GPLed.]
Well, if I ca
On Thursday 02 November 2006 23:11, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Nov 2006, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> > Is the following license, displayed as a precondition for
> > downloading the software, DFSG-free? (Specifically, are there any
> > traps in it that I am not seeing?)
>
> Since (or assu
On Thu, 02 Nov 2006, Sean Kellogg wrote:
> On Thursday 02 November 2006 23:11, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > Since (or assuming) it actually is GPLed, you can totally ignore
> > the clickwrap. Simply arrange[1] to have the code distributed to
> > you simply under the terms of the GPL. [If it's not possi
9 matches
Mail list logo
