On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 05:51:03PM -0800, Sean Kellogg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> In fact, as an end user it is well within my right to use the firefox logo
> and
> name with iceweasel. It's debian, who has chosen to place a product into
> direct competition, who has to watch it's Ps and Qs
On Tue, 05 Dec 2006, Sean Kellogg wrote:
> I cannot produce a car identical to a Ford Focus and then say "well,
> it's a Ford Focus because the feature set is identical."
This is a totally useless analogy. In this example there is no
functional meaning in the name of the vehicle, whereas there cle
Sean Kellogg writes:
> When the consumer (a.k.a. debian user) goes to the console and decides s/he
> wishes to obtain firefox, from the fine folks at the Mozilla Foundation, they
> do what? They run 'apt-get install firefox.' When they do so they are not
> given Firefox from the Mozilla Found
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 16:39, Michael Poole wrote:
> Sean Kellogg writes:
> > On Tuesday 05 December 2006 13:57, Jeff Carr wrote:
> >> I notice that recently you have complied with Mozilla's request to not
> >> use their trademarks for your browser packages. However, you can't
> >> also use th
Sean Kellogg writes:
> On Tuesday 05 December 2006 13:57, Jeff Carr wrote:
>> I notice that recently you have complied with Mozilla's request to not
>> use their trademarks for your browser packages. However, you can't
>> also use their trademark to switch users to a competing product.
>> ("bait-a
El martes, 5 de diciembre de 2006 a las 13:57:48 -0800, Jeff Carr escribía:
> I notice that recently you have complied with Mozilla's request to not
> use their trademarks for your browser packages. However, you can't
> also use their trademark to switch users to a competing product.
> ("bait-and
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 13:57, Jeff Carr wrote:
> I notice that recently you have complied with Mozilla's request to not
> use their trademarks for your browser packages. However, you can't
> also use their trademark to switch users to a competing product.
> ("bait-and-switch") The same tradema
On Tue, 05 Dec 2006 17:58:05 +1100 Ben Finney wrote:
> All of those need to be qualified by *whose* GPL; that's why the
> recommendation for licensing a work under the GPL is "[...] GNU
> General Public License, as published by the Free Software Foundation
> [...]".
Yeah, I'm well aware of this.
On Tue, 05 Dec 2006, Jeff Carr wrote:
> I notice that recently you have complied with Mozilla's request to
> not use their trademarks for your browser packages. However, you
> can't also use their trademark to switch users to a competing
> product. ("bait-and-switch") The same trademark issues are
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 11:07:23PM +0100, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 01:57:48PM -0800, Jeff Carr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I notice that recently you have complied with Mozilla's request to not
> > use their trademarks for your browser packages. However, y
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 01:57:48PM -0800, Jeff Carr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I notice that recently you have complied with Mozilla's request to not
> use their trademarks for your browser packages. However, you can't
> also use their trademark to switch users to a competing product.
> ("bait-an
I notice that recently you have complied with Mozilla's request to not
use their trademarks for your browser packages. However, you can't
also use their trademark to switch users to a competing product.
("bait-and-switch") The same trademark issues are why there is not a
package called openoffice.
Tom Marble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Simon's blog entry is from a while ago, so yes the comments are closed.
Radical interface design idea: why not remove the links instead of
letting people waste time sending to an error-bouncer?
> But you can comment here, send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> and
MJ Ray wrote:
> I just tried to add a trackback to this thread from the previously-cited
> article and was told 'ERROR: Comments and Trackbacks are disabled for
> the entry you specified.' Clearly comments are enabled, as a comment
> appears on that page. I'll try a cc on this mail, but I feel Su
\"Anthony W. Youngman\" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> And what happens if you DON'T have a place in common where you trade?
[...]
I don't know and it sounds like a common case in this global software
distribution game.
I just tried to add a trackback to this thread from the previously-cited
article and w
Terry Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> > I have placed them in the Public Domain.
>
> PD is the most free 'license' possible.
Assuming that this means PD as opposed to copyright-controlled,
not 'in the PD' meaning published.
> > This is all 100% my own work.
>
> Means he
16 matches
Mail list logo
