Re: creative commons

2007-01-13 Thread Francesco Poli
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 21:42:49 -0800 Jeff Carr wrote: > On 01/09/07 09:16, Francesco Poli wrote: > > > Please do _not_ reply to my personal e-mail address, while Cc:ing > > the list address, as I didn't ask you to do so. > > Please follow the code of conduct on Debian lists: > > http://www.debian.o

Re: creative commons

2007-01-13 Thread Francesco Poli
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 21:53:50 -0800 Jeff Carr wrote: > On 01/11/07 12:27, Francesco Poli wrote: > > > You seem to be happy with free programs whose documentation is > > non-free. > > Well now, I'm not like that. It's not up to me if the authors choose a > NC clause. Of course, it's not up to you

Re: creative commons

2007-01-13 Thread Francesco Poli
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:07:30 -0800 Jeff Carr wrote: > On 01/12/07 09:27, Francesco Poli wrote: > > >> Even though the existence of an optional clause (like NC) appears > >> to contradict the DFSG in situations we can imagine, that does not > >> rule out it's use will always contradict the DFSG fo

Re: creative commons

2007-01-13 Thread MJ Ray
Jeff Carr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think you could argue Bill Gates has been arbitrary and inconsistent > on content ownership issues also (of course in different ways). Don't > you think so? I don't recall Bill Gates's views on that (they don't get discussed with me as often as RMS's) but i