On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 11:57:13PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Thu, 08 Feb 2007, Anthony Towns wrote:
The DFSG refers to copyright licensing, it doesn't cover patents or
trademarks.
It actually doesn't refer to any of them specifically. It does talk
about licensing, but it doesn't
On Thu, 08 Feb 2007, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 11:57:13PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Thu, 08 Feb 2007, Anthony Towns wrote:
The DFSG refers to copyright licensing, it doesn't cover patents or
trademarks.
It actually doesn't refer to any of them specifically. It
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've seen a previous review from debian legal about the Creative Commons
licences which renders them non free. However, I've just come across a licence
claiming to be Creative Commons Deed Attribution 2.5 which is considerably
shorter and afaict is
This one time, at band camp, Matthew Johnson said:
I've seen a previous review from debian legal about the Creative Commons
licences which renders them non free. However, I've just come across a licence
claiming to be Creative Commons Deed Attribution 2.5 which is considerably
shorter and
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Stephen Gran wrote:
All data files, except the songs and the font files mentioned above,
are licensed under the following license:
Creative Commons Deed Attribution 2.5
That looks fine.
cool
Matthew Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've seen a previous review from debian legal about the Creative Commons
licences which renders them non free. However, I've just come across a
licence
claiming to be
Invitation
Please consider contributing to ICAS 2007, ICNS 2007 and the associated
workshops listed below.
Conference: June 19-25, 2007, Athens, Greece
Important deadline for full paper submission: February 10, 2007
Please forward the Call for Submissions to the appropriate groups.
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 00:38:34 -0800 Don Armstrong wrote:
On Thu, 08 Feb 2007, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 11:57:13PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Thu, 08 Feb 2007, Anthony Towns wrote:
The DFSG refers to copyright licensing, it doesn't cover patents
or trademarks.
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 11:14:27 -0500 Joe Smith wrote:
[...]
Well that is just the non-legalese synopsis of the CC-by-2.5.
It seems so.
It was not intended to be used as an actual licence text.
Definitely *not* intended.
It certainly can be used as a licence text. (Just about anything can
9 matches
Mail list logo