Ben Finney wrote:
> The set of permissions you receive is the *intersection* of the
> permissions granted by all licenses to the work (as modified by
> rights you have regardless of license under copyright law). You
> may only exercise those permissions that remain.
>
> The set of restrictions yo
Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:
> Ben Finney wrote:
> > The set of permissions you receive is the *intersection* of the
> > permissions granted by all licenses to the work (as modified by
> > rights you have regardless of license under copyright law). You
> > may only exercise those permissions that rema
Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 20:29:09 +0200 Arnoud Engelfriet wrote:
> > Your argument is that the trademark holder will win, because the
> > licensee exceeded the trademark license. I am afraid someone will
> > argue that the copyright license (from the same entity) should count
> >
On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 11:41:21 +0200 Arnoud Engelfriet wrote:
> Francesco Poli wrote:
> > On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 20:29:09 +0200 Arnoud Engelfriet wrote:
> > > Your argument is that the trademark holder will win, because the
> > > licensee exceeded the trademark license. I am afraid someone will
> > > a
Francesco Poli wrote:
> As I understand it, the current proposed wording is:
>
> | The work [X] is a trademark, held by [Y], representing [Z].
The sign [X] (hereafter "the Mark") is a trademark, rights to which
are held by [Y], representing [Z] if applicable (hereafter "the
Mark Holder").
The wo
On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 21:24:00 +0200 Arnoud Engelfriet wrote:
> Francesco Poli wrote:
> > As I understand it, the current proposed wording is:
> >
> > | The work [X] is a trademark, held by [Y], representing [Z].
>
> The sign [X] (hereafter "the Mark") is a trademark, rights to which
> are held by
This is a proposed text for a GR. I can't actually propose a GR (not a
DD), so I request that someone else who cares propose it or a similar
proposal.
---begin proposed GR---
Resolved:
That the DFSG shall be amended, by inserting at the end of clause 3, in italics:
(There is a special exceptio
Suraj, please don't send me copies of messages to the mailing list;
http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct>.
"Suraj N. Kurapati" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ben Finney wrote:
> > The set of permissions you receive is the *intersection* of the
> > permissions granted by all licenses t
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 05:50:36PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> This is a proposed text for a GR. I can't actually propose a GR (not a
> DD), so I request that someone else who cares propose it or a similar
> proposal.
>
> ---begin proposed GR---
> Resolved:
> That the DFSG shall be amended
I wrote:
>> Historically, this exception has been an unwritten assumption; in most
>> discussions, this exception has been agreed on by everyone involved.
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>If that is the case, then why would it be necessary to write this down
>in the DFSG? Personally, I don't think we ne
10 matches
Mail list logo
