Re: [OT] Re: Gmail (was: Dual licensing)

2007-05-15 Thread MJ Ray
Jordi Gutierrez Hermoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 14/05/07, Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 14 May 2007 14:53:11 -0500 Jordi Gutierrez Hermoso wrote: What's a good webmail to use then? The URLs I referenced suggest some alternative e-mail services, IIRC. I see no

Re: help with crafting proper license header for a dual-licensing project

2007-05-15 Thread Shriramana Sharma
As many people have pointed out, I realize I should be saying proprietary when I used the word commercial. I also realize that the GPL does not preclude commercial == for profit usage. I was merely echoing the terminology used by Trolltech. I do not condone it however. Thanks as always for

Remakes of older games

2007-05-15 Thread Miriam Ruiz
Hi, I want to package some games who happen to be remakes of older 8-bit games: http://www.masoftware.es/ I've already talked to upstream and they're licensing them under GPL, so no problem about the license. There are also other programs and games in the repository which are more or less

Re: [OT] Re: Gmail (was: Dual licensing)

2007-05-15 Thread Francesco Poli
On Mon, 14 May 2007 18:56:26 -0500 Jordi Gutierrez Hermoso wrote: On 14/05/07, Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 14 May 2007 14:53:11 -0500 Jordi Gutierrez Hermoso wrote: On 11/05/07, Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: P.S.: I recommend you against the use of Google

Re: Could you please forward this proposed license to Teosto? (was: Re: Choosing a license for Frets on Fire songs)

2007-05-15 Thread Matthew Johnson
On Tue May 15 17:25, Jason A. Spiro wrote: But one question: Do those license terms allow the songs to be distributed in a separate Debian package from the primary fretsonfire package? No, it will have to be amended to allow this as was suggested elsewhere in this thread. What if the

Re: Could you please forward this proposed license to Teosto? (was: Re: Choosing a license for Frets on Fire songs)

2007-05-15 Thread Jason A. Spiro
2007/4/27, Jason Spiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2007/4/27, Matthew Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] How about using: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd-nc/1.0/legalcode with 4. d. added saying: You may not distribute, publicly display, publicly perform, or publicly

Re: EPSG data reviewing in progress

2007-05-15 Thread Francesco Poli
On Mon, 14 May 2007 17:18:22 +0200 Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 10:14:35AM +, Joerg Jaspert wrote: Hi Maintainer, i dont think the EPSG tables license is free, so the dataset cant go into Debian main. Its a dont modify, non-commercial only license and a

Re: Remakes of older games

2007-05-15 Thread Francesco Poli
On Tue, 15 May 2007 19:44:41 +0200 Miriam Ruiz wrote: Hi, I want to package some games who happen to be remakes of older 8-bit games: http://www.masoftware.es/ I've already talked to upstream and they're licensing them under GPL, so no problem about the license. Well, it must be seen

Re: [OT] Re: Gmail (was: Dual licensing)

2007-05-15 Thread Jordi Gutierrez Hermoso
On 15/05/07, Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 14 May 2007 18:56:26 -0500 Jordi Gutierrez Hermoso wrote: On 14/05/07, Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 14 May 2007 14:53:11 -0500 Jordi Gutierrez Hermoso wrote: On 11/05/07, Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: help with crafting proper license header for a dual-licensing project

2007-05-15 Thread Ben Finney
Shriramana Sharma [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: As many people have pointed out, I realize I should be saying proprietary when I used the word commercial. I also realize that the GPL does not preclude commercial == for profit usage. I was merely echoing the terminology used by Trolltech. I do not

Re: Remakes of older games

2007-05-15 Thread Wesley J. Landaker
On Tuesday 15 May 2007 16:07:04 Francesco Poli wrote: On Tue, 15 May 2007 19:44:41 +0200 Miriam Ruiz wrote: I've already talked to upstream and they're licensing them under GPL, so no problem about the license. Well, it must be seen *if* upstream actually have the right to license them