"Ricardo Yanez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've been approached by what seems to be an attorney from a Chilean
> NGO called "Derechos Digitales" (http://www.derechosdigitales.org/),
> pointing out that a financial newspaper called "Diario Financiero"
> (http://www.elfinanciero.cl/) is using the
Hi debian legal list,
I've been approached by what seems to be an attorney from a Chilean NGO
called "Derechos Digitales" (http://www.derechosdigitales.org/), pointing
out that a financial newspaper called "Diario Financiero"
(http://www.elfinanciero.cl/) is using the Debian swirl logo illegally.
# ATTENTION: I am currently NOT in Strasbourg because#
# haveing the last 4 weeks of my military #
# service and can not reply in short delays. #
###
Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like a tit-for-a-tat clause so that those who modify it and
> distribute
> it are obligated to publish their modifications. The MIT license does not
> provide that.
On the other hand, the MIT license permits even use by the objectionable
perso
Le vendredi 13 juillet 2007 à 07:20 +0200, Kern Sibbald a écrit :
> > Then, unless I have seriously misunderstood the reworded system
> > libraries exception, I think relicensing Bacula under the GPLv3 (or
> > dual-licensing under v2 and v3) should be fine for Debian.
>
> Sorry, but could you run
5 matches
Mail list logo
