>I am wondering if Java GPLed application can link with CDDL classes?
>Case looks like the cdrecord question i saw in the archive.
>The case is in CarMetal (geometrical program derived from the wondeful
>CaR from René Grothman)
>http://db-maths.nuxit.net/CaRMetal/
You first need to be very carefu
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 17:15:25 + John Halton wrote:
> On 15/11/2007, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
[usual unbacked assertions and handwaving by Mr. Schilling...]
>
> It is possible the licence uses the "version two or later" version of
> the GPL, which would allow the software to
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 09:09:04PM +0100, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> I think that being a lawyer you will agree that " or
> later" is *at most* a permission given by the original licensor to
> direct licensees (i.e. parties entering version two contract) to
> SUBLICENSE (licensees can become subli
Michael Gilbert gmail.com> writes:
>
> Stephen Gran wrote:
> > That being said, packages that exist solely to download external
> > non-free content have traditionally been considered contrib material.
> > If this is just a helper script that nothing else in the package uses,
> > it seems perfec
Le jeudi 15 novembre 2007 à 17:04 +0100, Joerg Schilling a écrit :
> >CarMetal uses colorchooser https://colorchooser.dev.java.net/ wich is
> >CDDL licensed.
>
> If colorchooser has been developed independently from CaRMetal, and only
> CaRMetal calls colorchooser, it is indeed similar to what hap
"John Halton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 15/11/2007, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You first need to be very carefull to find out the license for this
> > software. It does not mention the GPL version number, which makes
> > it hard to find the authors will.
> >
> > Given the
On 15/11/2007, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You first need to be very carefull to find out the license for this
> software. It does not mention the GPL version number, which makes
> it hard to find the authors will.
>
> Given the fact that a lot of the files have not been touched si
On 15/11/2007, Michael Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i don't see a difference. if any part of the package requires access
> to non-free data to function correctly, then the entire package should
> be considered to depend on non-free.
>
> this is different from the compiz situation where the
8 matches
Mail list logo
