Re: Grammarsoft Public Licence 1.0

On Sun, 2 Mar 2008 22:07:40 -0500 Joe Smith wrote: [...] > Well it is no less free than the MPL. IMO, the MPL does *not* meet the DFSG. Some other debian-legal contributors share this opinion: http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/06/msg00221.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/03

Re: Questions about liblouis

2008/2/26, Eitan Isaacson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 3. The translation tables that are read at run-time are considered > part of this code and are under the terms of the GPL. Any changes to > these tables and any additional tables that are created for use by > this code must be made publicly avai

Re: Desert island test

Sean Kellogg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > The provision that I must post changes does not restrict ones ability to sell > or give away the software, it simply imposes a constraint. This constraint is > in no way different than the constrain imposed by the GPL that source code > must accomp