Giancarlo Niccolai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Walter Landry wrote:
> > Giancarlo Niccolai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> In example, I can release Falcon as a Debian package under GPL, and
> >> let users pick FPLL if they wish.
> >
> > That would be perfect. Many other programs in Debian are
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
MJ Ray wrote:
> Giancarlo Niccolai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...]
>> The license is tightly based on Apache 2, with extra
>> clarifications and permissions. [...]
>
> Summary: I believe that any interpreter under this Falcon P.L.
> licence will conta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
MJ Ray wrote:
> Sean Kellogg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wednesday 19 March 2008 03:10:07 pm Francesco Poli wrote:
>>> I don't think that copyright laws give you the right to control
>>> distribution of "Scripts", that is to say, works written in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Walter Landry wrote:
> Giancarlo Niccolai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> In example, I can release Falcon as a Debian package under GPL, and
>> let users pick FPLL if they wish.
>
> That would be perfect. Many other programs in Debian are
> dual-licens
Mauro Lizaur wrote:
> I remember Michiel writing it. In the Netherlands you don't need to
> claim copyright, it comes from writing it.
>
> However in this case, Andy payed (100 guilders if I remember correctly)
> for mined, so that would make it a "work for hire".
Please note that "work for hire"
Hi All,
I got a reply to the post on comp.os.minix about mined:
---
Jan-Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I remember Michiel writing it. In the Netherlands you don't need to
claim copyright, it comes from writing it.
However in this case, Andy payed (100 guilders if I remember correctly)
for mined
"Mauro Lizaur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I intended to do a qa upload to fix some bugs on the package mined
> [0] which is orphaned[1], and i got a lintian warning about the file
> debian/copyright where it has no copyright holder,
Rather, that the copyright holder is not identified.
> when
Hi,
Am Di 25 Mär 2008 03:07:24 CET
schrieb "Mauro Lizaur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I intended to do a qa upload to fix some bugs on the package
> mined [0] which is orphaned[1], and i got a lintian warning about
> the file debian/copyright where it has no copyright holder,
> when i asked to the ups
Giancarlo Niccolai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...]
> The license is tightly based on Apache 2, with extra clarifications
> and permissions. [...]
Summary: I believe that any interpreter under this Falcon P.L. licence
will contaminate other software and so fail DFSG 9. Also, I think the
licence c
Sean Kellogg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 March 2008 03:10:07 pm Francesco Poli wrote:
> > I don't think that copyright laws give you the right to control
> > distribution of "Scripts", that is to say, works written in your
> > programming language.
> [...]
> There's even the questi
10 matches
Mail list logo
