-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> On sam, 2008-03-22 at 22:33 +0100, Giancarlo Niccolai wrote:
>>> Have you considered the GNU LGPL (v2.1)?
>>>
>> Yes, but I encountered strong resistance from FSF when proposing
>> a "lighter" (with exceptions) LGPL version.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> On ven, 2008-03-21 at 10:09 +0100, Giancarlo Niccolai wrote:
>>> This clause makes the license a copyleft one. It is free, but
>>> this is a huge restriction compared to the original license.
>>> And this turns the license int
On Thursday 27 March 2008 06:54:36 pm Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > The point is that, as previously noted, the patentability of grammar
> > sets (i.e. artificial languages) has been recently debated. Including
> > the definition of the scripts in this license has the aim to prevent a
> > Big Guy to
On sam, 2008-03-22 at 22:33 +0100, Giancarlo Niccolai wrote:
> > Have you considered the GNU LGPL (v2.1)?
> >
> Yes, but I encountered strong resistance from FSF when proposing a
> "lighter" (with exceptions) LGPL version.
This is, again, because you are not proposing additional permissions
(for w
On ven, 2008-03-21 at 10:09 +0100, Giancarlo Niccolai wrote:
> > This clause makes the license a copyleft one. It is free, but this is a
> > huge restriction compared to the original license. And this turns the
> > license into yet another copyleft license that will be incompatible with
> > other o
Hi Simon, thanks for forwarding this.
Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Basically, this post is a For-Your-Information note, and while it
> doesn't bring up something for discussion on this list, I do think a
> license change in the IETF may be interesting to some debian-legal
> participants.
My sense fr
Dear all,
I'd like to share an email that convinced the developers of the NodeBox
library [0] to switch from a non-free license to GPL. I just thought that it
might be useful for future reference to non-legal experts like me, as it
attemps to clear up a common confusion about the relation of comme
Hello All,
Sorry about the radio-silence there. I've been busy. Thanks for all the
comments on the license.
I'll write the authors to ask them to change it to a DFSG compatible
license. It seems they just copied something from the intarweb and applied
it. Who knows if they'll just switch? :
All,
The IETF is about to change their IPR policy and turn it into a two-step
process where contributors assign rights to the IETF Trust which then
grant rights to others. The relevant documents are:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipr-outbound-rights-06.txt
http://www.ietf.org/
9 matches
Mail list logo
