Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
Also, the TeXinfo source file contains scraps that are extracted from other
files (*.cc) distributed in the tarball. These files are released under
GPL-2+. Does that constitute a violation of the GPL?
I can't identify which scraps were copied into fixed.txi
* MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-09 10:20]:
Rafael Laboissiere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Please respect the M-F-T header when replying]
Not visible on this client. Guessing. Please state wishes in body.
It was:
Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Just a further question, if the documentation is distributed as part of
the package itself under a GPL license then the only issue is the
inclusion of the fixed.texi and/or fixed.txi file within the package
tar-ball. The documentation is delivered with the source files where the
help strings
Hi folks,
During the non-free-RFC purge, the question of the license of RFC1436 has
arisen. In the forwarded message below, you can see that it does not bear
an IETF copyright and states Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
However, Simon has raised some questions about the Berne
John Goerzen writes:
Hi folks,
During the non-free-RFC purge, the question of the license of RFC1436 has
arisen. In the forwarded message below, you can see that it does not bear
an IETF copyright and states Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
However, Simon has raised some
5 matches
Mail list logo
