Re: Misuse of Debian logo for City Tourism

2008-07-25 Thread Mauro Lizaur
Cyril Brulebois wrote: >> Will you please respond to my E-Mail ASAP. I am curious as to whether >> this promotion, for self-profit, is a valid use. I personally do not >> like the Debian GNU/Linux Logo being used for the profit, and the profit >> of a city. One, that I will admit, lacks anything in

Re: Misuse of Debian logo for City Tourism

2008-07-25 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Tim Heckman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (25/07/2008): > I've been a long time user of Debian GNU/Linux, and I can recognize > that logo anywhere. Well, I was watching a local news station, and > noticed this commerical using the Debian GNU/Linux logo. > http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.ind

Misuse of Debian logo for City Tourism

2008-07-25 Thread Tim Heckman
Hello, I've been a long time user of Debian GNU/Linux, and I can recognize that logo anywhere. Well, I was watching a local news station, and noticed this commerical using the Debian GNU/Linux logo. http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&VideoID=24476641 Will you plea

Re: Conflicting license for Adeona?

2008-07-25 Thread Arnoud Engelfriet
Ben Finney wrote: > I don't think "is intended for [use Foo, Bar, Baz] only" is a > restriction upon the recipient. It states the *intent*, but isn't > phrased as a condition or restriction on what the recipient actually > may do. I agree. My reading is that this is a warning of some kind. If you